-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8267938: (sctp) SCTP channel factory methods should check platform support #4246
Conversation
👋 Welcome back chegar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@ChrisHegarty The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
/label remove security |
@ChrisHegarty |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@ChrisHegarty This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
java/net/SctpSanity.java passed on our machine with this patch.
Thanks for fixing it.
EPROTONOSUPPORT and ESOCKTNOSUPPORT are subtly different and I don't know if ESOCKTNOSUPPORT is possible. Checking both errors is okay/harmless so I think this change is okay. |
ESOCKTNOSUPPORT is the reported error for SOCK_SEQPACKET (SctpMultiChannel), when the kernel SCTP module is not present. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks OK to me.
/integrate |
@ChrisHegarty Since your change was applied there have been 33 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit bd31653. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The SCTP channel factory methods, namely SctpChannel::open, SctpServerChannel::open, and SctpMultiChannel::open, are specified to throw UnsupportedOperationException, if the SCTP protocol is not supported. Currently, underlying platform support is assumed once the appropriate libsctp.so.1 library is present (along with its supported interface functions). This may not always be the case, e.g. if the Linux sctp kernel module is not present or loaded. In which case a SocketException is thrown.
It would be more appropriate to check for EPROTONOSUPPORT and ESOCKTNOSUPPORT, and throw UOE rather than SE.
The existing java/net/SctpSanity.java tests already covers this case, when run on platforms without support.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4246/head:pull/4246
$ git checkout pull/4246
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4246
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4246/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4246
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4246
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4246.diff