8253470: Javadoc clean up in Filter and Headers

[pconcannon]

Hi,

Could someone please review my doc-only fix for JDK-8253470 - 'Javadoc clean up in Filter and Headers' ?

This fix is set of formatting changes intended to clean up the javadoc of the following classes :

com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter
com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter.Chain
com.sun.net.httpserver.Headers

This issue is a sub-task of JDK-8252822

Kind regards,
Patrick

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8253470: Javadoc clean up in Filter and Headers

Reviewers

• Daniel Fuchs (@dfuch - Reviewer)
• Michael McMahon (@Michael-Mc-Mahon - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/429/head:pull/429
$ git checkout pull/429

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back pconcannon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@pconcannon The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 04: Full - Incremental (c4a6548)
• 03: Full - Incremental (4de7e6c)
• 02: Full - Incremental (66d628f)
• 01: Full (bfff3c8)
• 00: Full (74d45b932fd625479dc2eb3854949aaf51d90b24)

[dfuch]

Thanks for working on this issue Patrick!

A few comments below:

[openjdk]

@pconcannon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for more details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253470: Javadoc clean up in Filter and Headers

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, michaelm

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• b8966e1: 8253928: G1: Remove G1ConcurrentMarkThread::set_in_progress declaration

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[pconcannon]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@pconcannon Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

• f686a38: 8253926: Use extra_size correctly in anon_mmap_aligned
• b8966e1: 8253928: G1: Remove G1ConcurrentMarkThread::set_in_progress declaration

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 0fd41c3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.