Skip to content

Conversation

@iignatev
Copy link
Member

@iignatev iignatev commented Jun 10, 2021

Hi all,

could you please review this small and test-only change for resourcehogs/serviceability/jvmti/GetObjectSizeOverflow.java test?

the test's main class just orchestrates execution and hence should be run in a driver mode, the patch also makes small refactoring of the test code: removes redundant imports, simplifies process creation, and adds checks of the exit code.

testing: resourcehogs/serviceability tests on {linux,windows,macosx}-x64

Thanks,
-- Igor


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8268530: resourcehogs/serviceability/jvmti/GetObjectSizeOverflow.java should be run in driver mode

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4452/head:pull/4452
$ git checkout pull/4452

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4452
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4452/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4452

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4452

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4452.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 10, 2021

👋 Welcome back iignatyev! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8268530 8268530: resourcehogs/serviceability/jvmti/GetObjectSizeOverflow.java should be run in driver mode Jun 10, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2021

@iignatev To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • 2d
  • awt
  • beans
  • build
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah
  • sound
  • swing

@iignatev
Copy link
Member Author

/cc serviceability

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 10, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2021

@iignatev
The serviceability label was successfully added.

@iignatev iignatev marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2021 07:57
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 10, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 10, 2021

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2021

@iignatev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8268530: resourcehogs/serviceability/jvmti/GetObjectSizeOverflow.java should be run in driver mode

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ea19b04: 8268481: Delete JAWT test files for mac
  • f271eb8: 8268303: Incorrect casts in JfrWriterHost::write for Ticks and Tickspan
  • ab01cb5: 8268339: Upstream: 8267989: Exceptions thrown during upcalls should be handled
  • 1fd8146: 8268461: ARM32: vector intrinsics reaches ShouldNotReachHere
  • 78b09ab: 8268463: Windows 32bit build fails in DynamicCodeGenerated\libDynamicCodeGenerated.cpp
  • 5a66628: 8263107: PSPromotionManager::copy_and_push_safe_barrier needs acquire memory barrier
  • d4377af: 8263303: C2 compilation fails with assert(found_sfpt) failed: no node in loop that's not input to safepoint

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 10, 2021
@iignatev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, Serguei!

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 10, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 10, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2021

@iignatev Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ea19b04: 8268481: Delete JAWT test files for mac
  • f271eb8: 8268303: Incorrect casts in JfrWriterHost::write for Ticks and Tickspan
  • ab01cb5: 8268339: Upstream: 8267989: Exceptions thrown during upcalls should be handled
  • 1fd8146: 8268461: ARM32: vector intrinsics reaches ShouldNotReachHere
  • 78b09ab: 8268463: Windows 32bit build fails in DynamicCodeGenerated\libDynamicCodeGenerated.cpp
  • 5a66628: 8263107: PSPromotionManager::copy_and_push_safe_barrier needs acquire memory barrier
  • d4377af: 8263303: C2 compilation fails with assert(found_sfpt) failed: no node in loop that's not input to safepoint

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit ae29f9c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants