Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8269417: Minor clarification on NonblockingQueue utility #4600

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

caoman
Copy link
Contributor

@caoman caoman commented Jun 26, 2021

Hi,

Could you review this change mainly based on the comments in #4379?
I also added an assertion to ensure and better understand why the Atomic::store() in append() is correct.

Stress tested with fastdebug build with:
$ make test TEST="gtest:NonblockingQueueTestBasics gtest:NonblockingQueueTest" GTEST="REPEAT=-1"


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8269417: Minor clarification on NonblockingQueue utility

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4600/head:pull/4600
$ git checkout pull/4600

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4600
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4600/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4600

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4600

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4600.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 26, 2021

👋 Welcome back manc! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 26, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 26, 2021

@caoman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 26, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 26, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just one suggestion in commentary.

src/hotspot/share/utilities/nonblockingQueue.inline.hpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2021

@caoman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8269417: Minor clarification on NonblockingQueue utility

Reviewed-by: kbarrett, iwalulya

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a977157: 8261579: AArch64: Support for weaker memory ordering in Atomic
  • ee1e202: 8268821: Split systemDictionaryShared.cpp
  • 03d54e6: Merge
  • 5624069: 8269426: Rename test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/t8150782 to accessClassAndFindClass
  • 09bb846: 8267952: async logging supports to dynamically change tags and decorators
  • 20640a5: 8269534: Remove java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/TimedAcquireLeak.java from ProblemList.txt
  • efe8423: 8269403: Fix jpackage tests to gracefully handle jpackage app launcher crashes
  • 8d09596: 8269304: Regression ~5% in 2005 in b27
  • e4c5446: 8268236: The documentation of the String.regionMatches method contains error

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 27, 2021
Copy link

@kimbarrett kimbarrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Copy link
Member

@walulyai walulyai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@caoman
Copy link
Contributor Author

caoman commented Jun 29, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2021

Going to push as commit bb42d75.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 29, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 29, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2021

@caoman Pushed as commit bb42d75.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@caoman caoman deleted the 8269417 branch June 29, 2021 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants