Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8269827: JMH tests for AES/GCM byte[] and bytebuffers #4672

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

ascarpino
Copy link
Contributor

@ascarpino ascarpino commented Jul 2, 2021

Hi,

I need a review of these new jmh tests that run AES/GCM encryption and decryption using byte[], heap bytebuffers, and direct bytebuffers as input and output buffers for single and multi-part testing.

thanks

Tony


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8269827: JMH tests for AES/GCM byte[] and bytebuffers

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4672/head:pull/4672
$ git checkout pull/4672

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4672
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4672/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4672

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4672

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4672.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 2, 2021

👋 Welcome back ascarpino! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 2, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 2, 2021

@ascarpino The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 2, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 2, 2021

Webrevs

@Param({"128"})
private int keyLength;

@Param({""+16*1024})
@Param({"" + 1024, "" + 1500, "" + 4096, "" + 16384})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that you don't calculate anymore, how about just string literals like "1024" etc?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny.. I didn't even notice that

* This test rotates the IV and creates a new GCMParameterSpec for each encrypt
* benchmark operation
*/

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want to create a "small" version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I debated it.. I'm still not sure, but I guess I could.

private Cipher encryptCipher;
private Cipher decryptCipher;
SecretKeySpec ks;
GCMParameterSpec gcm_spec;
byte[] aad;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not an expert on this, but why no more AAD?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For a performance test there isn't any value in adding an AAD. It's data sitting in a buffer that an be easily replicated with a multipart operation

@ericcaspole
Copy link

From the JMH point of view, looks good to me.

Copy link

@ericcaspole ericcaspole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the JMH point of view, looks good to me.

@Param({"128"})
private int keyLength;

@Param({"" + 1024, "" + 1500, "" + 4096, "" + 16384})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can update the line above as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Grr.. I'm not sure how I missed that one

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 8, 2021

@ascarpino This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8269827: JMH tests for AES/GCM byte[] and bytebuffers

Reviewed-by: ecaspole, weijun

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 447 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6f171b9: 8268965: TCP Connection Reset when connecting simple socket to SSL server
  • 4f322a9: 8270096: Shenandoah: Optimize gc/shenandoah/TestRefprocSanity.java for interpreter mode
  • bca570c: 8269962: SA has unused Hashtable, Dictionary classes
  • 4a45d95: 8270021: Incorrect log decorators in gc/g1/plab/TestPLABEvacuationFailure.java
  • 30bba54: 8270064: Problem list tools/jdeprscan/tests/jdk/jdeprscan/TestRelease.java due to JDK-8270060
  • 2c883ee: 8267982: Set the node after peephole optimization to be removed
  • 4fbcce1: 8269886: Inaccurate error message for compressed hprof test
  • a96012f: 8269803: G1: remove unnecessary NoRefDiscovery
  • 4e18ec2: 8269993: [Test]: java/net/httpclient/DigestEchoClientSSL.java contains redundant @run tags
  • e54585b: 8268363: AArch64: Implement string_indexof_char intrinsic in SVE
  • ... and 437 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/fafc4d976434c196c16b652c859073c5888b992e...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 8, 2021
@ascarpino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 8, 2021

Going to push as commit 5832882.
Since your change was applied there have been 447 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6f171b9: 8268965: TCP Connection Reset when connecting simple socket to SSL server
  • 4f322a9: 8270096: Shenandoah: Optimize gc/shenandoah/TestRefprocSanity.java for interpreter mode
  • bca570c: 8269962: SA has unused Hashtable, Dictionary classes
  • 4a45d95: 8270021: Incorrect log decorators in gc/g1/plab/TestPLABEvacuationFailure.java
  • 30bba54: 8270064: Problem list tools/jdeprscan/tests/jdk/jdeprscan/TestRelease.java due to JDK-8270060
  • 2c883ee: 8267982: Set the node after peephole optimization to be removed
  • 4fbcce1: 8269886: Inaccurate error message for compressed hprof test
  • a96012f: 8269803: G1: remove unnecessary NoRefDiscovery
  • 4e18ec2: 8269993: [Test]: java/net/httpclient/DigestEchoClientSSL.java contains redundant @run tags
  • e54585b: 8268363: AArch64: Implement string_indexof_char intrinsic in SVE
  • ... and 437 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/fafc4d976434c196c16b652c859073c5888b992e...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 8, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 8, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 8, 2021

@ascarpino Pushed as commit 5832882.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@ascarpino ascarpino deleted the micro branch July 8, 2021 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
3 participants