New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8269923: runtime/jni/checked/TestPrimitiveArrayCriticalWithBadParam.java failed with "FATAL ERROR in native method: Primitive type array expected but not received for JNI array operation" #4696
Conversation
|
@zhengyu123 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.
|
@zhengyu123 - I forgot to ask about what testing has been done? |
The fix is good.
The 134 exit code on Posix systems comes from the fact that abort() raises SIGABRT, which is signal number 6 (b0110) . The exit code of the process is set by the OS in the lower 8 bits of the return value: bits 0-6 contains the signal number; bit 7 is set if a core dump occurs. So we have an exit value of b10000110 == decimal 134.
It is debatable whether we should make Windows behave the same for our os::abort.
Thanks,
David
@dcubed-ojdk @dholmes-ora Thanks for the reviews. GHA all clean. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit bffb1a7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit bffb1a7. |
On Posix compatible platforms, when abort with code dump, it exits with os:abort(), which has exit code 134.
but not on Windows, where it still exits with 1.
The test expects exit code 134 when jni check fails, so it fails on Windows. Maybe we should have Windows also to return 134 for consistence?
The fix changes the check to non-zero exit code.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4696/head:pull/4696
$ git checkout pull/4696
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4696
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4696/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4696
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4696
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4696.diff