-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8268824: Remove unused jdk.accessibility APIs deprecated for removal in JDK 9 #4845
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
/csr |
|
👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@prrace this pull request will not be integrated until the CSR request JDK-8270918 for issue JDK-8268824 has been approved. |
Webrevs
|
|
/label swing,awt |
|
Please "review" the CSR too : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8270918 |
|
@prrace The |
| @Deprecated(since="8", forRemoval=true) | ||
| static protected Component componentWithFocus = null; | ||
|
|
||
| static private Component componentWithFocus_private = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we rename the "new" "xx_private" fields to the shorter version? The javadoc for the protected fields can be applied to the "private version"(but w/o @deprecated tag).
So in fact we can change "protected" to the "private", drop the "@deprecated" tags, and delete the "xx_private" versions of the fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the javadoc is needed since these are now private fields.
I can however rename them to remove _private.
|
@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 296 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 4548677.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
These fields
The CSR for this is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8270918
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4845/head:pull/4845$ git checkout pull/4845Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4845$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4845/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4845View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4845Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4845.diff