Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8225313: serviceability/jvmti/HeapMonitor/MyPackage/HeapMonitorStatObjectCorrectnessTest.java failed with Unexpected high difference percentage #4864

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

lmesnik
Copy link
Member

@lmesnik lmesnik commented Jul 22, 2021

Fixed as suggested (increasing accepted error rate and a number of iteration). Verified by 2000 runs in our CI lab.The average test execution time ~5s. The bugs in the problemlist are duplicates of this issue.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8225313: serviceability/jvmti/HeapMonitor/MyPackage/HeapMonitorStatObjectCorrectnessTest.java failed with Unexpected high difference percentage

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4864/head:pull/4864
$ git checkout pull/4864

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4864
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4864/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4864

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4864

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4864.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 22, 2021

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

private static BigObject obj;

private native static boolean statsHaveExpectedNumberSamples(int expected, int percentError);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method is not implemented and not used.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 22, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2021

@lmesnik The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 22, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 22, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Leonid,

These changes seem quite reasonable.

There is a comment in HeapMonitorStatIntervalTest.java that still refers to a 10% threshhold.

Thanks,
David

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2021

@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8225313: serviceability/jvmti/HeapMonitor/MyPackage/HeapMonitorStatObjectCorrectnessTest.java failed with Unexpected high difference percentage

Reviewed-by: dholmes, kevinw

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 22, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update looks good.

Thanks.

@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Jul 22, 2021

testing shows that HeapMonitorStatIntervalTest.java needed to make more iterations a well as other fixed tests.

@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Jul 22, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2021

Going to push as commit 09e5321.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 258f188: 8270961: [TESTBUG] Move GotWrongOOMEException into vm.share.gc package
  • 3cadc36: 8270336: [TESTBUG] Fix initialization in NonbranchyTree
  • c2ed336: 8270912: Clean up G1CollectedHeap::process_discovered_references()
  • 8e27d4e: 8271043: Rename G1CollectedHeap::g1mm()
  • d1257d5: 8271126: ProblemList runtime/InvocationTests/invokevirtualTests.java
  • 50bb731: 8270286: com.sun.net.httpserver.spi.HttpServerProvider: remove use of deprecated API
  • 9131a8f: 8267940: [macos] java/awt/print/Dialog/DialogOwnerTest.java fails
  • 6096dd9: 8268893: jcmd to trim the glibc heap
  • c36755d: Merge
  • 89f7998: 8266347: assert(Dependencies::is_concrete_root_method(fm, ctxk) == Dependencies::is_concrete_method(m, ctxk)) failed: mismatch
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0790f04d8a41aa61b4633e822120d913ec89d900...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 22, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 22, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 22, 2021

@lmesnik Pushed as commit 09e5321.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@lmesnik lmesnik deleted the 8225313 branch February 12, 2022 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants