Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8271893: mark hotspot runtime/PerfMemDestroy/PerfMemDestroy.java test as ignoring external VM flags #5003

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@iignatev
Copy link
Member

@iignatev iignatev commented Aug 4, 2021

Hi all,

please review this one-liner that adds @requires vm.flagless to PerfMemDestroy.java test?

Thanks,
-- Igor


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8271893: mark hotspot runtime/PerfMemDestroy/PerfMemDestroy.java test as ignoring external VM flags

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5003/head:pull/5003
$ git checkout pull/5003

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5003
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5003/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5003

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5003

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5003.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 4, 2021

👋 Welcome back iignatyev! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8271893 8271893: mark hotspot runtime/PerfMemDestroy/PerfMemDestroy.java test as ignoring external VM flags Aug 4, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Aug 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

@iignatev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

Loading

@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Aug 4, 2021

Webrevs

Loading

coleenp
coleenp approved these changes Aug 4, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Ok, plus trivial.

Loading

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

@iignatev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8271893: mark hotspot runtime/PerfMemDestroy/PerfMemDestroy.java test as ignoring external VM flags

Reviewed-by: coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 28 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cdf3d55: 8271890: mark hotspot runtime/Dictionary tests which ignore external VM flags
  • 91bbe2f: 8271888: build error after JDK-8271599
  • 6b55ef3: 8271456: Avoid looking up standard charsets in "java.desktop" module
  • 392fcc9: 8271589: fatal error with variable shift count integer rotate operation.
  • 9f1edaf: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places
  • 452f7d7: 8271217: Fix race between G1PeriodicGCTask checks and GC request
  • 221e4b9: 8270797: ShortECDSA.java test is not complete
  • 0a27f26: 8265057: G1: Investigate removal of maintenance of two BOT thresholds
  • eec64f5: 8256844: Make NMT late-initializable
  • 4df1bc4: 6350025: API documentation for JOptionPane using deprecated methods.
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0199b03eb3bd9ffe79b5193ff1792144b5c488f1...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Aug 4, 2021
@iignatev
Copy link
Member Author

@iignatev iignatev commented Aug 4, 2021

Thanks, Coleen.

/integrate

Loading

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

Going to push as commit 359c708.
Since your change was applied there have been 31 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a3b0143: 8271887: mark hotspot runtime/CDSCompressedKPtrs tests which ignore external VM flags
  • 6c17e6d: 8271891: mark hotspot runtime/Safepoint tests which ignore external VM flags
  • ff7431e: 8271886: mark hotspot runtime/InvocationTests tests which ignore external VM flags
  • cdf3d55: 8271890: mark hotspot runtime/Dictionary tests which ignore external VM flags
  • 91bbe2f: 8271888: build error after JDK-8271599
  • 6b55ef3: 8271456: Avoid looking up standard charsets in "java.desktop" module
  • 392fcc9: 8271589: fatal error with variable shift count integer rotate operation.
  • 9f1edaf: 8271599: Javadoc of floorDiv() and floorMod() families is inaccurate in some places
  • 452f7d7: 8271217: Fix race between G1PeriodicGCTask checks and GC request
  • 221e4b9: 8270797: ShortECDSA.java test is not complete
  • ... and 21 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0199b03eb3bd9ffe79b5193ff1792144b5c488f1...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Loading

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 4, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Aug 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

@iignatev Pushed as commit 359c708.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Loading

@iignatev iignatev deleted the 8271893 branch Aug 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants