Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8267894: Skip work for empty regions in G1 Full GC #5143

Closed

Conversation

walulyai
Copy link
Member

@walulyai walulyai commented Aug 17, 2021

Hi all,

Please review this change to skip doing work on regions that were empty at the beginning of the Full GC in phases that execute on a per-region basis.

Testing: Tier 1-3.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8267894: Skip work for empty regions in G1 Full GC

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5143/head:pull/5143
$ git checkout pull/5143

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5143
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5143/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5143

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5143

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5143.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 17, 2021

👋 Welcome back iwalulya! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 17, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 17, 2021

@walulyai The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 17, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 17, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@kstefanj kstefanj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the change looks good in general, but maybe we should go with a "named" state for free regions. Either we change the name for the default value in G1FullGCHeapRegionAttr or we add a new state that we set for free regions. What do you think?

@walulyai
Copy link
Member Author

I think the change looks good in general, but maybe we should go with a "named" state for free regions. Either we change the name for the default value in G1FullGCHeapRegionAttr or we add a new state that we set for free regions. What do you think?

AFAIK, changing the default value to "Free" instead of "Invalid" would suffice, however, need to clarify on how that is handled by assert(!is_invalid(obj), "not initialized yet"); which indicate some sort of transition from "Invalid" to "initialized".

@kstefanj
Copy link
Contributor

kstefanj commented Aug 18, 2021

I think the text "not initialized yet" is a bit wrong. We should never call is_skip_marking() for objects in "Invalid" regions, because there can't be any objects there. Same goes for "Free" regions. So I would change the assert to something like:

assert(!is_free(obj), "Should be no objects in free regions."); 

I agree that changing the default value should work. One benefit of using a new state could be to have a difference between free and not committed regions. But not sure it is worth the effort right now.

Copy link
Contributor

@kstefanj kstefanj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@walulyai This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8267894: Skip work for empty regions in G1 Full GC

Reviewed-by: sjohanss, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 72 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 18, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm.

@walulyai
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @kstefanj and @tschatzl for the reviews

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 23, 2021

Going to push as commit d542745.
Since your change was applied there have been 73 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 741f58c: 8272417: ZGC: fastdebug build crashes when printing ClassLoaderData
  • b7f75c0: 8271142: package help is not displayed for missing X11/extensions/Xrandr.h
  • e8a289e: 8272609: Add string deduplication support to SerialGC
  • b690f29: 8269687: pauth_aarch64.hpp include name is incorrect
  • f77a1a1: 8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34
  • 04a806e: 8270344: Session resumption errors
  • d85560e: 8267161: Write automated test case for JDK-4479161
  • 1ea437a: 8272720: Fix the implementation of loop unrolling heuristic with LoopPercentProfileLimit
  • 86add21: 8223923: C2: Missing interference with mismatched unsafe accesses
  • c701f6e: 8272739: Misformatted error message in EventHandlerCreator
  • ... and 63 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/d06d0b9e9d9d27aa549455f19b9803752431bcbb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 23, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 23, 2021

@walulyai Pushed as commit d542745.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants