New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8273261: Replace 'while' cycles with iterator with enhanced-for in java.base #5328
8273261: Replace 'while' cycles with iterator with enhanced-for in java.base #5328
Conversation
|
@turbanoff The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Tested "tier2" on linux-x86_64-server-fastdebug Ubuntu 21.04
Only one test
|
@turbanoff Unknown command |
@turbanoff Unknown command |
@turbanoff Unknown command |
@turbanoff Unknown command |
Generally this looks like a good improvement as the resulting code becomes more readable.
Changes in sun/net or jar index classes look fine. Please obtain approval from maintainers of the other areas before integrating.
@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 31 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dfuch, @RogerRiggs, @irisclark, @seanjmullan) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.
|
LGTM
For the security related code a second reviewer would be good.
/integrate |
@turbanoff |
Can someone sponsor changes, please? I believe we have enough approvals. |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 56b8b35.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RogerRiggs @turbanoff Pushed as commit 56b8b35. |
There are few places in code where manual while loop is used with Iterator to iterate over Collection.
Instead of manual while cycles it's preferred to use enhanced-for cycle instead: it's less verbose, makes code easier to read and it's less error-prone.
It doesn't have any performance impact: java compiler generates similar code when compiling enhanced-for cycle.
Similar cleanups:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5328/head:pull/5328
$ git checkout pull/5328
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5328
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5328/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5328
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5328
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5328.diff