-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
8271602: Add Math.ceilDiv() family parallel to Math.floorDiv() family #5341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
/csr |
👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@rgiulietti this pull request will not be integrated until the CSR request JDK-8273090 for issue JDK-8271602 has been approved. |
@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/** | ||
* Returns the ceiling modulus of the {@code long} arguments. | ||
* <p> | ||
* The floor modulus is {@code r = x - (ceilDiv(x, y) * y)}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In line 1464 I think floor
should be ceiling
.
* Returns the ceiling modulus of the {@code long} arguments. | ||
* <p> | ||
* The floor modulus is {@code r = x - (ceilDiv(x, y) * y)}, | ||
* has the same sign as the divisor {@code y} or is zero, and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In line 1465 I think same
should be opposite
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just pushed the corrections.
@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 243 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@bplb) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
/integrate |
@rgiulietti |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit da38ced.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@bplb @rgiulietti Pushed as commit da38ced. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR ideally continues #5285, which has been closed as a consequence of inadvertently removing the branch on my repo. See there for initial discussion.
Sorry for the mess.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5341/head:pull/5341
$ git checkout pull/5341
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5341
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5341/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5341
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5341
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5341.diff