Skip to content

8271602: Add Math.ceilDiv() family parallel to Math.floorDiv() family #5341

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

@rgiulietti rgiulietti commented Sep 1, 2021

This PR ideally continues #5285, which has been closed as a consequence of inadvertently removing the branch on my repo. See there for initial discussion.

Sorry for the mess.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8271602: Add Math.ceilDiv() family parallel to Math.floorDiv() family

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5341/head:pull/5341
$ git checkout pull/5341

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5341
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5341/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5341

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5341

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5341.diff

@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor Author

/csr

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 1, 2021

👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Sep 1, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@rgiulietti this pull request will not be integrated until the CSR request JDK-8273090 for issue JDK-8271602 has been approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 1, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 1, 2021

Webrevs

/**
* Returns the ceiling modulus of the {@code long} arguments.
* <p>
* The floor modulus is {@code r = x - (ceilDiv(x, y) * y)},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In line 1464 I think floor should be ceiling.

* Returns the ceiling modulus of the {@code long} arguments.
* <p>
* The floor modulus is {@code r = x - (ceilDiv(x, y) * y)},
* has the same sign as the divisor {@code y} or is zero, and
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In line 1465 I think same should be opposite.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just pushed the corrections.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Sep 21, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2021

@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8271602: Add Math.ceilDiv() family parallel to Math.floorDiv() family

Reviewed-by: bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 243 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d9872ba: 8273590: Move helper classes in G1 post evacuation sub tasks to cpp files
  • 688b3fe: 8274070: Rectify problemlist platform for failing test on macos12
  • eeaf43b: 8274114: ProblemList serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixed.java on linux-aarch64 in -Xcomp mode
  • 517405e: 8273965: some testlibrary_tests/ir_framework tests fail when c1 disabled
  • 11cddd3: 8272114: Unused _last_state in osThread_windows
  • cbe57e8: 8273684: Replace usages of java.util.Stack with ArrayDeque
  • a72c8aa: 8273921: Refactor NSK/JDI tests to create thread using factory
  • 161fdb4: 8273935: (zipfs) Files.getFileAttributeView() throws UOE instead of returning null when view not supported
  • 0fc47e9: 8266666: Implementation for snippets
  • 6d91a3e: 8269039: Disable SHA-1 Signed JARs
  • ... and 233 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9689f615206e96f17ffc1fe7a8efeee0a90c904b...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@bplb) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 21, 2021
@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 22, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2021

@rgiulietti
Your change (at version 8e36836) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@bplb
Copy link
Member

bplb commented Sep 22, 2021

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2021

Going to push as commit da38ced.
Since your change was applied there have been 256 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d39aad9: 8273924: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException thrown in java.util.JapaneseImperialCalendar.add()
  • c9de806: 8274039: codestrings gtest fails when hsdis is present
  • 33df388: 8274003: ProcessHandleImpl.Info toString has an if check which is always true
  • 0a36163: 8272600: (test) Use native "sleep" in Basic.java
  • c6df3c9: 8274071: Clean up java.lang.ref comments and documentation
  • 71788c6: 8271287: jdk/jshell/CommandCompletionTest.java fails with "lists don't have the same size expected"
  • ba7d550: 8270139: jshell InternalError crash for import of @repeatable followed by unresolved ref
  • aefd4ac: 8258734: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestClassLoaderLeak.java failed with "RuntimeException: Could not find class leak"
  • d245a8c: 8274069: Clean up g1ParScanThreadState a bit
  • 3f73ca7: 8274068: Rename G1ScanInYoungSetter to G1SkipCardEnqueueSetter
  • ... and 246 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9689f615206e96f17ffc1fe7a8efeee0a90c904b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 22, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 22, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2021

@bplb @rgiulietti Pushed as commit da38ced.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@rgiulietti rgiulietti deleted the JDK-8271602 branch September 22, 2021 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants