Skip to content

Conversation

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Oct 7, 2020

Due to non-atomic LRB, there can be from-space oops in thread roots after evacuation.
To enforce to-space invariant, Shenandoah updates thread roots during final reference updating pause, but it can be done outside pause via thread handshake.

Test:

  • hotspot_gc_shenandoah

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (3/3 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ❌ (1/9 failed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test task

Issue

  • JDK-8254103: Shenandoah: Move updating thread roots to concurrent phase

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/541/head:pull/541
$ git checkout pull/541

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 7, 2020

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 7, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 7, 2020

@zhengyu123 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 7, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 7, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@rkennke rkennke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Thanks!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254103: Shenandoah: Move updating thread roots to concurrent phase

Reviewed-by: rkennke

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 39 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7e82ba1: 8254146: Avoid unnecessary volatile write on new AtomicBoolean(false)
  • 6d13c76: 8253191: C2: Masked byte comparisons with large masks produce wrong result on x86
  • a191c58: 8253404: C2: assert(C->live_nodes() <= C->max_node_limit()) failed: Live Node limit exceeded limit
  • 6bc4931: 8253717: Relocate stack overflow code out of thread.hpp/cpp
  • 782d45b: 8242882: opening jar file with large manifest might throw NegativeArraySizeException
  • f860372: 8253566: clazz.isAssignableFrom will return false for interface implementors
  • 66f27b5: 8254015: copy_to_survivor_space should use in-hand klass for scanning
  • 76a5852: 8253756: C2 CompilerThread0 crash in Node::add_req(Node*)
  • 8f9e479: 8254144: Non-x86 Zero builds fail with return-type warning in os_linux_zero.cpp
  • 7952c06: 8254166: Zero: return-type warning in zeroInterpreter_zero.cpp
  • ... and 29 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/54b340b44f1f3dca2c3f3e8cd2abd8196e0027d8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 8, 2020
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 8, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 8, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@zhengyu123 Since your change was applied there have been 39 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7e82ba1: 8254146: Avoid unnecessary volatile write on new AtomicBoolean(false)
  • 6d13c76: 8253191: C2: Masked byte comparisons with large masks produce wrong result on x86
  • a191c58: 8253404: C2: assert(C->live_nodes() <= C->max_node_limit()) failed: Live Node limit exceeded limit
  • 6bc4931: 8253717: Relocate stack overflow code out of thread.hpp/cpp
  • 782d45b: 8242882: opening jar file with large manifest might throw NegativeArraySizeException
  • f860372: 8253566: clazz.isAssignableFrom will return false for interface implementors
  • 66f27b5: 8254015: copy_to_survivor_space should use in-hand klass for scanning
  • 76a5852: 8253756: C2 CompilerThread0 crash in Node::add_req(Node*)
  • 8f9e479: 8254144: Non-x86 Zero builds fail with return-type warning in os_linux_zero.cpp
  • 7952c06: 8254166: Zero: return-type warning in zeroInterpreter_zero.cpp
  • ... and 29 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/54b340b44f1f3dca2c3f3e8cd2abd8196e0027d8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit d036dca.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 deleted the JDK-8254103-conc-threads-update branch February 11, 2021 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants