Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8254173: Add Zero, Minimal hotspot targets to submit workflow #546

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Oct 7, 2020

Zero VM and Minimal VM builds are routinely discovering the problems with internal Hotspot dependencies. Mostly because they turn off the whole lot of VM features, and every path that is not guarded by a feature #ifdef or build file list fails.

It would be good to add Zero and Minimal targets to submit workflow.

It seems to add two ~9 minute stages, compared to ~17 minute stage for building no-pch hotspot, and ~33 minutes for full JDK.

Attention @rwestberg.

Testing:


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ⏳ (5/5 running) ⏳ (2/2 running) ⏳ (2/2 running)

Issue

  • JDK-8254173: Add Zero, Minimal hotspot targets to submit workflow

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/546/head:pull/546
$ git checkout pull/546

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 7, 2020

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 7, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 7, 2020

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 7, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 7, 2020

Webrevs

@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as draft October 7, 2020 16:15
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 7, 2020
@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2020 17:44
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 7, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254173: Add Zero, Minimal hotspot targets to submit workflow

Reviewed-by: erikj, rwestberg

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e1187c4: 8248262: Wrong link target in ModuleDescriptor#isAutomatic's API documentation
  • 9cdfd0f: 8254096: remove jdk.test.lib.Utils::getMandatoryProperty(String) method
  • d1e94ee: 8253909: Implement detailed map file for CDS
  • 7733a0e: 8254182: remove Utils.tryFindJvmPid/waitForJvmPid
  • 4e5ef30: 8254104: MethodCounters must exist before nmethod is installed
  • fd0cb98: 8253901: ARM32: SIGSEGV during monitorexit due to incorrect register use (after JDK-8253540)
  • abe2593: 8232092: (fs) Files::isWritable returns false on a writeable root directory (win)
  • 5a9bd41: 8254102: use ProcessHandle::pid instead of ManagementFactory::getRuntimeMXBean to get pid in tests
  • 38159d5: 8253876: jdk/test/lib/hexdump/ASN1FormatterTest.java fails with "AssertionError: Lines expected [126] but found [202]"
  • db3053d: 8067127: Tags cleanup
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9543d7607bcb917811ef49c568c05459aedcd297...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 8, 2020
Copy link
Member

@rwestberg rwestberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Adding a few additional shorter build shouldn't increase the total runtime, as the test execution waits for all builds to be done, so we are limited by the full builds anyway.

One minor comment, perhaps rearrange the description a bit of these new flavors with the differentiating parts first. GitHub cuts them short in the overview list (see the list on the left at https://github.com/shipilev/jdk/actions/runs/293805791 for an example) so you can't currently tell which one is which in the overview without clicking on them.

Copy link
Member

@rwestberg rwestberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for fixing!

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Oct 8, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 8, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 8, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e1187c4: 8248262: Wrong link target in ModuleDescriptor#isAutomatic's API documentation
  • 9cdfd0f: 8254096: remove jdk.test.lib.Utils::getMandatoryProperty(String) method
  • d1e94ee: 8253909: Implement detailed map file for CDS
  • 7733a0e: 8254182: remove Utils.tryFindJvmPid/waitForJvmPid
  • 4e5ef30: 8254104: MethodCounters must exist before nmethod is installed
  • fd0cb98: 8253901: ARM32: SIGSEGV during monitorexit due to incorrect register use (after JDK-8253540)
  • abe2593: 8232092: (fs) Files::isWritable returns false on a writeable root directory (win)
  • 5a9bd41: 8254102: use ProcessHandle::pid instead of ManagementFactory::getRuntimeMXBean to get pid in tests
  • 38159d5: 8253876: jdk/test/lib/hexdump/ASN1FormatterTest.java fails with "AssertionError: Lines expected [126] but found [202]"
  • db3053d: 8067127: Tags cleanup
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9543d7607bcb917811ef49c568c05459aedcd297...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit bc23690.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants