Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8254175: Build no-pch configuration in debug mode for submit checks #547

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Oct 7, 2020

no-pch configuration is supposed to expose missing include dependencies. But currently it runs with default (release) bits, which misses symbols hidden in debug code. We should consider building it in debug mode.

Attention @rwestberg.

Testing:

  • GH workflow still works, see the builds in the latest run

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (3/3 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Issue

  • JDK-8254175: Build no-pch configuration in debug mode for submit checks

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/547/head:pull/547
$ git checkout pull/547

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 7, 2020

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 7, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 7, 2020

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 7, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 7, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@rwestberg rwestberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Just a similar comment as in #546, the name is a bit too long now, so perhaps just drop the "debug" from the description?

.github/workflows/submit.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/submit.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shipilev shipilev requested a review from rwestberg October 8, 2020 07:16
Copy link
Member

@rwestberg rwestberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Oct 8, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@shipilev This PR has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Oct 8, 2020

@erikj79, can you take a look as well? Or maybe @dholmes-ora wants to chime in on the sanity of the change?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254175: Build no-pch configuration in debug mode for submit checks

Reviewed-by: rwestberg, erikj, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 35 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b9873e1: 8253180: ZGC: Implementation of JEP 376: ZGC: Concurrent Thread-Stack Processing
  • a2f6519: 8233685: Test tools/javac/modules/AddLimitMods.java fails
  • 70be8c7: 8253965: Delete the outdated java.awt.PeerFixer class
  • ced46b1: 8254190: [s390] interpreter misses exception check after calling monitorenter
  • 5351ba6: 8254262: jdk.test.lib.Utils::createTemp* don't pass attrs
  • 8c0d3d7: 8254195: java/nio/file/Files/SubstDrive.java failed with "AssertionError: expected [144951656448] but found [144951640064]"
  • c2a5de6: 8253681: closed java/awt/dnd/MouseEventAfterStartDragTest/MouseEventAfterStartDragTest.html test failed
  • d036dca: 8254103: Shenandoah: Move updating thread roots to concurrent phase
  • 7e82ba1: 8254146: Avoid unnecessary volatile write on new AtomicBoolean(false)
  • 6d13c76: 8253191: C2: Masked byte comparisons with large masks produce wrong result on x86
  • ... and 25 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9543d7607bcb917811ef49c568c05459aedcd297...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 8, 2020
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Oct 9, 2020

This affects testing for everyone, so I would like someone from hotspot to chime in.

/label hotspot

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 9, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2020

@shipilev
The hotspot label was successfully added.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Oct 9, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 9, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 9, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2020

@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 35 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b9873e1: 8253180: ZGC: Implementation of JEP 376: ZGC: Concurrent Thread-Stack Processing
  • a2f6519: 8233685: Test tools/javac/modules/AddLimitMods.java fails
  • 70be8c7: 8253965: Delete the outdated java.awt.PeerFixer class
  • ced46b1: 8254190: [s390] interpreter misses exception check after calling monitorenter
  • 5351ba6: 8254262: jdk.test.lib.Utils::createTemp* don't pass attrs
  • 8c0d3d7: 8254195: java/nio/file/Files/SubstDrive.java failed with "AssertionError: expected [144951656448] but found [144951640064]"
  • c2a5de6: 8253681: closed java/awt/dnd/MouseEventAfterStartDragTest/MouseEventAfterStartDragTest.html test failed
  • d036dca: 8254103: Shenandoah: Move updating thread roots to concurrent phase
  • 7e82ba1: 8254146: Avoid unnecessary volatile write on new AtomicBoolean(false)
  • 6d13c76: 8253191: C2: Masked byte comparisons with large masks produce wrong result on x86
  • ... and 25 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/9543d7607bcb917811ef49c568c05459aedcd297...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 0230781.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8254175-no-pch-debug branch October 9, 2020 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants