New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8274069: Clean up g1ParScanThreadState a bit #5607
8274069: Clean up g1ParScanThreadState a bit #5607
Conversation
|
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The old name, enqueue_card_after_barrier_filters
, is still referenced in the comments.
(I also wonder if it makes sense to unify all callers of enqueue_card_if_tracked
to use write_ref_field_post
with template non-type arguments. Not in this PR ofc.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this change allow this inclusion of an .inline.hpp to be moved out of the .hpp?
33 #include "gc/g1/heapRegionRemSet.inline.hpp"
In the latest change I also touched up includes in that file a bit. Nothing about heapRegionRemSet has been used in that file... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks @albertnetymk @kstefanj @kimbarrett for your reviews. /integrate |
Going to push as commit d245a8c.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi all,
can I have reviews for this change that does some minor refactoring for issues found in JDK-8271880/PR#5037:
Testing: gha, local compilation, local gc/g1
Thanks,
Thomas
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5607/head:pull/5607
$ git checkout pull/5607
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5607
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5607/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5607
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5607
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5607.diff