Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8177814: jdk/editpad is not in jdk TEST.groups #5648

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Sep 23, 2021

@prrace notices this here: #5544 (comment). And I think it is the already open issue that this patch is fixing. While the original patch added the test in jdk_other, Phil suggests it to be added to jdk_desktop.

Additional testing:

  • jdk_editpad is passing

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5648/head:pull/5648
$ git checkout pull/5648

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5648
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5648/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5648

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5648

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5648.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 23, 2021

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2021

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 23, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 23, 2021

Webrevs

@mrserb
Copy link
Member

mrserb commented Sep 23, 2021

There is also one such test in the test/hotspot.
@prrace Not sure what is the best fix for this. Probably the test automation should run the headful tests from t1/2/3/etc instead of just jdk_desktop?

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Anyhow, how do you want to proceed with this PR?

Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's fix it this way

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2021

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8177814: jdk/editpad is not in jdk TEST.groups

Reviewed-by: serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 229 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a5f09d1: 8275031: runtime/ErrorHandling/MachCodeFramesInErrorFile.java fails when hsdis is present
  • ef0922e: 8274560: JFR: Add test for OldObjectSample event when using Shenandoah
  • 1e30695: 8274466: G1: use field directly rather than method in G1CollectorState::in_mixed_phase
  • dd93c6e: 8272167: AbsPathsInImage.java should skip *.dSYM directories
  • 829dea4: 8274945: Cleanup unnecessary calls to Throwable.initCause() in java.desktop
  • 75f5145: 8274925: Shenandoah: shenandoah/TestAllocHumongousFragment.java test failed on lock rank check
  • 83c3771: 8273881: Metaspace: test repeated deallocations
  • 3f01d03: 8275021: Test serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java fails with: java.io.IOException: Stack frame 0x4 not found
  • 3f07337: 8273614: Shenandoah: intermittent timeout with ConcurrentGCBreakpoint tests
  • 0d80f6c: 8274379: Allow process of unsafe access errors in check_special_condition_for_native_trans
  • ... and 219 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/da38ced3299cbd02f210bea4130990a43f6104bf...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 12, 2021
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2021

Going to push as commit cfe7471.
Since your change was applied there have been 229 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a5f09d1: 8275031: runtime/ErrorHandling/MachCodeFramesInErrorFile.java fails when hsdis is present
  • ef0922e: 8274560: JFR: Add test for OldObjectSample event when using Shenandoah
  • 1e30695: 8274466: G1: use field directly rather than method in G1CollectorState::in_mixed_phase
  • dd93c6e: 8272167: AbsPathsInImage.java should skip *.dSYM directories
  • 829dea4: 8274945: Cleanup unnecessary calls to Throwable.initCause() in java.desktop
  • 75f5145: 8274925: Shenandoah: shenandoah/TestAllocHumongousFragment.java test failed on lock rank check
  • 83c3771: 8273881: Metaspace: test repeated deallocations
  • 3f01d03: 8275021: Test serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java fails with: java.io.IOException: Stack frame 0x4 not found
  • 3f07337: 8273614: Shenandoah: intermittent timeout with ConcurrentGCBreakpoint tests
  • 0d80f6c: 8274379: Allow process of unsafe access errors in check_special_condition_for_native_trans
  • ... and 219 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/da38ced3299cbd02f210bea4130990a43f6104bf...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 12, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2021

@shipilev Pushed as commit cfe7471.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8177814-editpad-testgroup branch October 25, 2021 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants