Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8253563: Change to be ThreadLocal #570

wants to merge 1 commit into from


Copy link

@valeriepeng valeriepeng commented Oct 8, 2020

Could someone help reviewing this one-line change? This changes the provider list used during jar verification from InheritableThreadLocal to ThreadLocal. Existing usage and handling uses this field as temporary thread-specific provider list for jar verification. There seems to be no reason for it to be InheritableThreadLocal.

Existing regression tests pass with this change.



  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed


Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)


  • JDK-8253563: Change to be ThreadLocal



$ git fetch pull/570/head:pull/570
$ git checkout pull/570

Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 8, 2020

👋 Welcome back valeriep! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

Copy link

/label add security

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review security labels Oct 8, 2020
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2020

The security label was successfully added.

Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 8, 2020


Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2020

@valeriepeng This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253563: Change to be ThreadLocal

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 25 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d43f141: 8254351: Minimal VM build fails with undeclared identifier 'MaxVectorSize' after JDK-8252847
  • cc52358: 8254335: logging/logStream.hpp includes memory/resourceArea.hpp but doesn't need it
  • 4b5ac3a: 8252847: Optimize primitive arrayCopy stubs using AVX-512 masked instructions
  • ec41046: 8254348: Build fails when cds is disabled after JDK-8247536
  • e4469d2: 8247536: Support for pre-generated java.lang.invoke classes in CDS static archive
  • 7ec9c8e: 8233214: Remove runtime code not needed with CMS removed
  • 536b35b: 8254319: Shenandoah: Interpreter native-LRB needs to activate during HAS_FORWARDED
  • be26972: 8253379: [windows] Several jpackage tests failed with error code 1638
  • 52e45a3: 8229186: Improve error messages for TestStringIntrinsics failures
  • 6d2c1a6: 8254292: Update JMH devkit to 1.26
  • ... and 15 more:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 11, 2020
Copy link


@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 12, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 12, 2020
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2020

@valeriepeng Since your change was applied there have been 46 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c7f0064: 8253899: Make IsClassUnloadingEnabled signature match specification
  • aad3cf4: 8254234: Add test library stream object builder
  • 4184959: 8252374: Add a new factory method to concatenate a sequence of BodyPublisher instances into a single publisher.
  • 05459df: 8253765: C2: Control randomization in StressLCM and StressGCM
  • 6620b61: 8254573: Shenandoah: Streamline/inline native-LRB entry point
  • a6c23b7: 8253923: C2 doesn't always run loop opts for compilations that include loops
  • dfe8ba6: 8254320: Shenandoah: C2 native LRB should activate for non-cset objects
  • 295a44a: 8254558: Remove unimplemented Arguments::do_pd_flag_adjustments
  • 0fab73e: 8254560: Shenandoah: Concurrent Strong Roots logging is incorrect
  • 638f910: 8254559: Remove unimplemented JVMFlag::get_locked_message_ext
  • ... and 36 more:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit df1f132.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@valeriepeng valeriepeng deleted the JDK-8253563 branch October 12, 2020 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
integrated Pull request has been integrated security
2 participants