-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8274333: Redundant null comparison after Pattern.split #5708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8274333: Redundant null comparison after Pattern.split #5708
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back turbanoff! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@turbanoff The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
seanjmullan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The AlgorithmDecomposer change looks fine to me.
|
@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 690 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@seanjmullan, @wangweij, @RogerRiggs, @irisclark) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
/integrate |
|
@turbanoff |
|
@turbanoff This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 36b59f3.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@RogerRiggs @turbanoff Pushed as commit 36b59f3. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
In couple of classes, result part of arrays of Pattern.split is compared with
null. Pattern.split (and hence String.split) never returnsnullin array elements. Such comparisons are redundant.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5708/head:pull/5708$ git checkout pull/5708Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5708$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5708/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5708View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5708Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5708.diff