-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm #5820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back kbarrett! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@kimbarrett The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm
@kimbarrett This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm apart from the mentioned (imho) comment inaccuracy.
return; | ||
} else if (!Atomic::load_acquire(_continue_running)) { | ||
// To avoid a race that could leave buffers in the list after this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/avoid/handle/ (or something similar).
The change does not eliminate (or avoids) the race, but handles the (not logic-breaking) results of the race.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// To avoid a race that could leave buffers in the list after this | |
// To handle a benign race that could leave buffers in the list after this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The race involved is not a benign data race, it's a logic race that's not at all benign. I could describe the race in more detail if you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant "benign" wrt to what is actually tested (functionality of the ptrqueuebuffer), but you are right about that my suggestion is the wrong wording. Just leave it as is then.
Thomas
/integrate |
Going to push as commit c80a612.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@kimbarrett Pushed as commit c80a612. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this fix of the test, eliminating a race that could
unexpectedly leave buffers in the "completed" list after all the threads
have shut down.
Testing:
mach5 tier1
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5820/head:pull/5820
$ git checkout pull/5820
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5820
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5820/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5820
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5820
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5820.diff