Skip to content

8273614: Shenandoah: intermittent timeout with ConcurrentGCBreakpoint tests #5868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Oct 8, 2021

I were able to reproduce with aggressive heuristics.

A _wb_breakpoint GC request , while a concurrent GC is started. ShenandoahBreakpoint::_start_gc may not get set, as we bypass it if it is not a _wb_breakpoint GC, then we are forever blocked in ShenandoahBreakpoint::at_before_gc(), waiting for the flag to be set.

The solution is only run breakpoints during _wb_breakpoint GC.

Also, enforced _requested_gc_cause and _gc_requested order, ensure that read side sees latest _requested_gc_cause.

Test:

  • tier1 with Shenandoah

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8273614: Shenandoah: intermittent timeout with ConcurrentGCBreakpoint tests

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5868/head:pull/5868
$ git checkout pull/5868

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5868
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5868/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5868

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5868

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5868.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 8, 2021

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 8, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 8, 2021

@zhengyu123 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 8, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 8, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good with minor nits.

@@ -50,24 +50,37 @@

// Breakpoint support
class ShenandoahBreakpointGCScope : public StackObj {
private:
GCCause::Cause _cause;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better be const?

}
};

class ShenandoahBreakpointMarkScope : public StackObj {
private:
GCCause::Cause _cause;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also const?

_requested_gc_cause = cause;
_gc_requested.set();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah. This whole thing is under _gc_waiters_lock. But there is a raw read of _requested_gc_cause and _gc_requested in ShenandoahControlThread::run_service. Pity. Could you please fork it out as separate (more backportable) bug?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2021

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8273614: Shenandoah: intermittent timeout with ConcurrentGCBreakpoint tests

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b870468: 8274347: Passing a nested switch expression as a parameter causes an NPE during compile
  • 110e38d: 8274753: ZGC: SEGV in MetaspaceShared::link_shared_classes
  • b7af890: 8274430: Remove some debug error printing code added in JDK-8017163
  • aaf2401: 8274927: Remove unnecessary G1ArchiveAllocator code
  • c55dd36: 8275008: gtest build failure due to stringop-overflow warning with gcc11
  • 3edee1e: 8272723: Don't use Access API to access primitive fields
  • 49f8ce6: 8274773: [TESTBUG] UnsafeIntrinsicsTest intermittently fails on weak memory model platform
  • c032186: 8272968: AArch64: Remove redundant matching rules for commutative ops
  • a05873a: 8274952: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/TestRecordedFrameType.java failed when c1 disabled
  • 5ecc99b: 8274620: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java is timing out
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/6364719cd1c57220769ea580d958da8dc2fdf7f9...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 11, 2021
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2021

Going to push as commit 3f07337.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0d80f6c: 8274379: Allow process of unsafe access errors in check_special_condition_for_native_trans
  • b870468: 8274347: Passing a nested switch expression as a parameter causes an NPE during compile
  • 110e38d: 8274753: ZGC: SEGV in MetaspaceShared::link_shared_classes
  • b7af890: 8274430: Remove some debug error printing code added in JDK-8017163
  • aaf2401: 8274927: Remove unnecessary G1ArchiveAllocator code
  • c55dd36: 8275008: gtest build failure due to stringop-overflow warning with gcc11
  • 3edee1e: 8272723: Don't use Access API to access primitive fields
  • 49f8ce6: 8274773: [TESTBUG] UnsafeIntrinsicsTest intermittently fails on weak memory model platform
  • c032186: 8272968: AArch64: Remove redundant matching rules for commutative ops
  • a05873a: 8274952: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/TestRecordedFrameType.java failed when c1 disabled
  • ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/6364719cd1c57220769ea580d958da8dc2fdf7f9...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 11, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 11, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2021

@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit 3f07337.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants