Skip to content

8260428: Drop support for pre JDK 1.4 DatagramSocketImpl implementations #5887

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

pconcannon
Copy link
Contributor

@pconcannon pconcannon commented Oct 11, 2021

Hi,

Could someone please review my changes (and CSR) to drop support for pre JDK 1.4 DatagramSocketImpl implementations?

These changes propose to drop support for DatagramSocketImpls that were compiled with JDK 1.3 or older, which do not have support for connected sockets, for peeking at received datagrams, and for joining and leaving a group at a specific interface. This support is legacy, and should be relatively safe to remove as such implementations do not compile with JDK 1.4 or newer.

Finally, with this set of proposed changes, if you have an oldImpl, and don’t use connect, then the methods joinGroup and leaveGroup will throw NoSuchMethodError. However, the current behaviour in DatagramSocketImpl is to throw an UnsupportedOperationsException for a method not implemented. Should this set of changes update the joinGroup and leaveGroup methods in order to preserve this behaviour?

CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274633

Kind regards,

Patrick


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8260428: Drop support for pre JDK 1.4 DatagramSocketImpl implementations

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5887/head:pull/5887
$ git checkout pull/5887

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5887
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5887/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5887

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5887

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5887.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 11, 2021

👋 Welcome back pconcannon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 11, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2021

@pconcannon The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 11, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 11, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The spec and implementation change look good. I don't have time to study the test right but I see Daniel is looking at it.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2021

@pconcannon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8260428: Drop support for pre JDK 1.4 DatagramSocketImpl implementations

Reviewed-by: alanb, dfuchs, vtewari

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 12, 2021
@pconcannon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/csr needed

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Oct 26, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2021

@pconcannon this pull request will not be integrated until the CSR request JDK-8274633 for issue JDK-8260428 has been approved.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Oct 26, 2021
@pconcannon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2021

Going to push as commit 9771544.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e265f83: 8276107: Preventive collections trigger before maxing out heap
  • c8abe35: 8276121: G1: Remove unused and uninitialized _g1h in g1SATBMarkQueueSet.hpp
  • f55e68c: 8275950: Use only _thread_in_vm in ~ThreadBlockInVMPreprocess()
  • 4ac8403: 8276218: JFR: Clean up jdk.jfr.dcmd
  • 89ade1d: 8273416: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file after JDK-8252372 with UseSSE={0,1}
  • dbf5100: 8276201: Shenandoah: Race results degenerated GC to enter wrong entry point

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 1, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Nov 1, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 1, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2021

@pconcannon Pushed as commit 9771544.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants