-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8275344: -Xcheck:jni produces some warnings in the LCMS.c #5975
Conversation
👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@mrserb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 62 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
"Note that it is also possible to just clear an occurred exception before the creation of the IllegalArgumentException. Any thoughts about it?" I think wrapping it as you do is fine. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit c978ca8.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
The newly added test MTTransformReplacedProfile(yeah that test again) produce some warning if check:jni is enabled:
The root cause is in the "errorHandler", which is called by the lcms library and where we throw a CMSException. So when we get an error code from some lcms API and try to throw the CMSException it is might be already thrown in the "errorHandler".
The fix contains two parts:
The second part changed the stack trace which will get the user, an example:
old:
new:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5975/head:pull/5975
$ git checkout pull/5975
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/5975
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5975/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 5975
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 5975
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5975.diff