8253474: Javadoc clean up in HttpsExchange, HttpsParameters, and HttpsServer

[pconcannon]

Hi,

Could someone please review my doc-only fix for JDK-8253474: 'Javadoc clean up in HttpsExchange, HttpsParameters, and HttpsServer' ?

This fix is set of formatting changes intended to clean up the javadoc of the following classes :

com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpsExchange
com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpsParameters
com.sun.net.httpserver.HttpsServer

This issue is a sub-task of JDK-8252822

Kind regards,
Patrick

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

	Linux x32	Linux x64	Windows x64	macOS x64
Build	✔️ (1/1 passed)	✔️ (5/5 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1)		✔️ (9/9 passed)	❌ (1/9 failed)	✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test task

• Windows x64 (hs/tier1 compiler)

Issue

• JDK-8253474: Javadoc clean up in HttpsExchange, HttpsParameters, and HttpsServer

Reviewers

• Daniel Fuchs (@dfuch - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 45f4518
• Michael McMahon (@Michael-Mc-Mahon - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 45f4518

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/610/head:pull/610
$ git checkout pull/610

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back pconcannon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@pconcannon The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 06: Full - Incremental (d79f03f)
• 05: Full - Incremental (45f4518)
• 04: Full - Incremental (94689ae)
• 03: Full - Incremental (e02bb1a)
• 02: Full - Incremental (ef5b9fa)
• 01: Full - Incremental (7878b87)
• 00: Full (df06f8c)

[dfuch]

This is a JDK specific API - but since you're updating (filling out) some API doc comments that were previously empty I suspect a CSR will still be needed.
/csr

[openjdk]

@dfuch has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.
@pconcannon please create a CSR request and add link to it in JDK-8253474. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

[openjdk]

@pconcannon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253474: Javadoc clean up in HttpsExchange, HttpsParameters, and HttpsServer

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, michaelm

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 42 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6bd05b1: 8255074: sun.nio.fs.WindowsPath::getPathForWin32Calls synchronizes on String object
• 9e9f5e6: 8017179: [macosx] list1 and list2 vistble item isn't desired
• 2ee2b4a: 8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo
• 42a6ead: 8254884: Make sure jvm does not crash with Arm SVE and Vector API
• e5870cf: 8252133: The java/awt/GraphicsDevice/DisplayModes/CycleDMImage.java fails if metal pipeline is active
• afc967f: 8254783: jpackage fails on Windows when application name differs from installer name
• 3ccf487: 8253019: Enhanced JPEG decoding
• cfb02d4: 8250861: Crash in MinINode::Ideal(PhaseGVN*, bool)
• 0d35235: 8249927: Specify limits of jdk.serialProxyInterfaceLimit
• d6cef99: 8245417: Improve certificate chain handling
• ... and 32 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/3f9c8a39201644952c6d07b97695a5a7ef918622...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[pconcannon]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@pconcannon Since your change was applied there have been 49 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 7e26404: 8255000: C2: Unify IGVN processing when loop opts are over
• 27230fa: 8255026: C2: Miscellaneous cleanups in Compile and PhaseIdealLoop code
• c107178: 8253964: [Graal] UnschedulableGraphTest#test01fails with expected:<4> but was:<3>
• bd45191: 8255065: Zero: accessor_entry misses the IRIW case
• 2a06335: 8254785: compiler/graalunit/HotspotTest.java failed with "missing Graal intrinsics for: java/lang/StringLatin1.indexOfChar([BIII)I"
• 1b7ddeb: 8254976: Re-enable swing jtreg tests which were broken due to samevm mode
• 2e510e0: 8255043: Incorrectly styled copyright text
• 6bd05b1: 8255074: sun.nio.fs.WindowsPath::getPathForWin32Calls synchronizes on String object
• 9e9f5e6: 8017179: [macosx] list1 and list2 vistble item isn't desired
• 2ee2b4a: 8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo
• ... and 39 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/3f9c8a39201644952c6d07b97695a5a7ef918622...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit da97ab5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.