-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8257722: Improve "keytool -printcert -jarfile" output #6126
Conversation
👋 Welcome back hchao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@haimaychao The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@@ -2875,13 +2884,14 @@ private void doPrintCert(final PrintStream out) throws Exception { | |||
out.printf(rb.getString("Signer.d."), ++pos); | |||
out.println(); | |||
out.println(); | |||
out.println(rb.getString("Signature.")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove a newline as well. There needn't be 3 println()
calls.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
@@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ | |||
{"the.input", "The input"}, | |||
{"reply", "Reply"}, | |||
{"one.in.many", "%1$s #%2$d of %3$d"}, | |||
{"one.in.many1", "%1$s of signer #%2$d"}, | |||
{"one.in.many2", "%1$s #%2$d of %3$d of signer #%4$d"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
certificate #1 of 2 of signer #1
is a little too complicated. The second number is not really necessary. I think certificate #1 of signer #1
is enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Changed the warning message.
One new comment: Now that if there is only one cert, there is no need to write |
ss.add(signer); | ||
out.printf(rb.getString("Signer.d."), ++pos); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the while (entries.hasMoreElements())
block should end here, so that you collect all signers of all entries before printing them out. Also, there is no need to count CodeSigner
, you can simply get it from ss.size()
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine now.
I wonder if the order of signers in the set matters. It's possible that one signer appears first in the result of getCodeSigners()
but because HashSet
maintains no order it becomes the second. If you are also worried about this, you can make ss
a LinkedHashSet
.
@haimaychao This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 50 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
It'd be worry-free by keeping the same ordering. Changed as suggested. Thanks for the review! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit de93b1d.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@haimaychao Pushed as commit de93b1d. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This change does a few improvements to the output of
keytool -printcert -jarfile
command to help readability and diagnosis.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6126/head:pull/6126
$ git checkout pull/6126
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6126
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6126/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6126
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6126
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6126.diff