-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8275868: ciReplay: Inlining fails with "unloaded signature classes" due to wrong protection domains #6159
Conversation
…ue to wrong protection domains
👋 Welcome back chagedorn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@chhagedorn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
@chhagedorn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 180 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Vladimir and Dean for your reviews! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me too. Nice test!
Thanks Tobias for your review! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 5bb1992.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@chhagedorn Pushed as commit 5bb1992. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Replay compilation can fail to inline a method which was inlined in the normal run due to unresolved classes in the signature of an inlinee. The reason is that ciReplay is not resolving Java API classes with the protection domain of the holder class of the method to be replay compiled. Compiler replay is currently only resolving classes without a protection domain (i.e. an empty handle):
jdk/src/hotspot/share/ci/ciReplay.cpp
Lines 139 to 142 in 593401f
A more detailed description can be found in the description of JDK-8275868.
This patch fixes that and takes the protection domain of the holder class of the method to be compiled to resolve all other classes used for ciReplay. The unloaded classes check is done in
ciMethod::has_unloaded_classes_in_signature()
and bypasses the whitelist introduced by JDK-8262912. However, this is fine since the inlining decision is enforced by the inlining information in the replay file.To test the various scenarios mentioned in the description of JDK-8275868, I've added some support to use
DumpReplay
to not require a crash. I parse the inlining information from the hotspot log file to check that ciReplay applies the same inlining decisions as the normal run.Thanks,
Christian
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6159/head:pull/6159
$ git checkout pull/6159
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6159
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6159/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6159
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6159
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6159.diff