Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8276652: Missing row headers in MethodHandles.Lookup docs #6261

Conversation

LudwikJaniuk
Copy link
Contributor

@LudwikJaniuk LudwikJaniuk commented Nov 4, 2021

Added row headers missing in the table captioned "Access mode summary". This carries no visual change, but might be useful for screen readers.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8276652: Missing row headers in MethodHandles.Lookup docs

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6261/head:pull/6261
$ git checkout pull/6261

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6261
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6261/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6261

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6261

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6261.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 4, 2021

👋 Welcome back LudwikJaniuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2021

@LudwikJaniuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 4, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 4, 2021

Webrevs

mlchung
mlchung approved these changes Nov 4, 2021
Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung left a comment

Looks okay. Thanks for improving the documentation accessibility.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2021

@LudwikJaniuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8276652: Missing row headers in MethodHandles.Lookup docs

Reviewed-by: mchung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dcf36f8: 8275670: ciReplay: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError when trying to load java/lang/invoke/LambdaForm$MH
  • 81203ef: 8276655: Use blessed modifier order in SCTP
  • 2b5a32c: 8275718: Relax memory constraint on exception counter updates
  • 99d4b07: 8276649: MethodHandles.Lookup docs: replace the table in the cross-module access check section with list
  • 1533b81: 8276629: Use blessed modifier order in core-libs code
  • 7bb2173: 8276199: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LargeGatheringWrite.java fails to terminate correctly
  • b57715a: 8276573: Use blessed modifier order in jdk.javadoc
  • bf4ddf9: 8276338: Minor improve of wording for String.to(Lower|Upper)Case
  • afb502e: 8276550: Use SHA256 hash in build.tools.depend.Depend

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@mlchung) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 4, 2021
@LudwikJaniuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

LudwikJaniuk commented Nov 4, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Nov 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2021

@LudwikJaniuk
Your change (at version 3861350) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@mlchung
Copy link
Member

mlchung commented Nov 4, 2021

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2021

Going to push as commit 7e87f94.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dcf36f8: 8275670: ciReplay: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError when trying to load java/lang/invoke/LambdaForm$MH
  • 81203ef: 8276655: Use blessed modifier order in SCTP
  • 2b5a32c: 8275718: Relax memory constraint on exception counter updates
  • 99d4b07: 8276649: MethodHandles.Lookup docs: replace the table in the cross-module access check section with list
  • 1533b81: 8276629: Use blessed modifier order in core-libs code
  • 7bb2173: 8276199: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LargeGatheringWrite.java fails to terminate correctly
  • b57715a: 8276573: Use blessed modifier order in jdk.javadoc
  • bf4ddf9: 8276338: Minor improve of wording for String.to(Lower|Upper)Case
  • afb502e: 8276550: Use SHA256 hash in build.tools.depend.Depend

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 4, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Nov 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 4, 2021

@mlchung @LudwikJaniuk Pushed as commit 7e87f94.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants