Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8276774: Cookie stored in CookieHandler not sent if user headers contain cookie #6408

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

dfuch
Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch commented Nov 16, 2021

Hi,

Please find enclosed a patch that solves an unexpected interaction between server-set cookies and user-set cookies in the java.net.HttpClient.

In JDK 12 we fixed JDK-8213189 to allow user-supplied header to take precedence over (that is, replace) system-headers.
At the time the fact that server cookies would be added to the system-supplied headers by the CookieHandler (if present), and that a user-supplied cookie would therefore replace them (instead of simply appending to them) was overlooked.

This fix proposes to restore the behavior of JDK 11 WRT to cookies - and arrange for user-supplied cookies to be appended to server-supplied cookies.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8276774: Cookie stored in CookieHandler not sent if user headers contain cookie

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6408/head:pull/6408
$ git checkout pull/6408

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6408
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6408/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6408

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6408

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6408.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 16, 2021

👋 Welcome back dfuchs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 16, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 16, 2021

@dfuch The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 16, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 16, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Michael-Mc-Mahon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2021

@dfuch This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8276774: Cookie stored in CookieHandler not sent if user headers contain cookie

Reviewed-by: michaelm

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 11d819d: 8277439: G1: Correct include guard name in G1EvacFailureObjectsSet.hpp
  • 7a046e0: 8277371: Remove unnecessary DefNewGeneration::ref_processor_init()
  • 3a76d39: 8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule
  • 2f20b0d: 8273039: JShell crashes when naming variable or method "abstract" or "strictfp"
  • f34f119: 8277213: CompileTask_lock is acquired out of order with MethodCompileQueue_lock
  • 47564ca: 8275643: C2's unaryOp vector intrinsic does not properly handle LongVector.neg
  • 2f0bde1: 8277102: Dubious PrintCompilation output
  • 839033b: 8276976: Rename LIR_OprDesc to LIR_Opr
  • 89b125f: 8275527: Refactor forward pointer access
  • 36bd4a3: 8277404: Test VMDeprecatedOptions.java failing with Unable to create shared archive file
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/276bfcd1a115f90dde644abef79d64bb61788c75...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 19, 2021
@dfuch
Copy link
Member Author

dfuch commented Nov 19, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2021

Going to push as commit 03debf2.
Since your change was applied there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b15e6f0: 8277449: compiler/vectorapi/TestLongVectorNeg.java fails with release VMs
  • 11d819d: 8277439: G1: Correct include guard name in G1EvacFailureObjectsSet.hpp
  • 7a046e0: 8277371: Remove unnecessary DefNewGeneration::ref_processor_init()
  • 3a76d39: 8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule
  • 2f20b0d: 8273039: JShell crashes when naming variable or method "abstract" or "strictfp"
  • f34f119: 8277213: CompileTask_lock is acquired out of order with MethodCompileQueue_lock
  • 47564ca: 8275643: C2's unaryOp vector intrinsic does not properly handle LongVector.neg
  • 2f0bde1: 8277102: Dubious PrintCompilation output
  • 839033b: 8276976: Rename LIR_OprDesc to LIR_Opr
  • 89b125f: 8275527: Refactor forward pointer access
  • ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/276bfcd1a115f90dde644abef79d64bb61788c75...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 19, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 19, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2021

@dfuch Pushed as commit 03debf2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dfuch dfuch deleted the user-cookie-8276774 branch November 30, 2021 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants