Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo #647

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mrserb
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb commented Oct 14, 2020

java.beans.Introspector is using a new cache mechanism since Java9 in com.sun.beans.introspect.ClassInfo::CACHE which uses a SoftReference cache over the class, which makes the class "leak", unless clearing the cache manually or collecting the SoftReference by the GC.

Note that this is not a pure "leak", because the SoftReference will be collected if there is no enough memory on the system, but if the heap is big enough then all objects referenced from the cached class will be in the memory.

The class has a reference to the ClassLoader, and If the soft reference to the class is not collected by the GC, then the ClassLoader cannot be unloaded and this block the jar file removing.

The solution is to update the implementation of Introspector.flushCaches()/flushFromCaches(Class) to clear the whole cache or the cache for the specific class.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Issue

  • JDK-8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/647/head:pull/647
$ git checkout pull/647

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 14, 2020

👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 14, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 14, 2020

@mrserb The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • beans

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the beans client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 14, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 14, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@azuev-java azuev-java left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2020

@mrserb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo

Reviewed-by: kizune

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 129 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • acacae5: 8254843: Exception launching app on windows in some cases
  • 856037c: 8255006: Add NULL-check to StringDedupTable lookup
  • ee6eb98: 8254995: [x86] ControlWord::print(), rc/pc variables might not be initialized
  • e577c8c: 8253641: Missing newline in the printout of certain JFR events
  • 89e5444: 8254788: Dead code in the sun.java2d.xr.XRPMBlitLoops$XrSwToPMBlit
  • 3267b09: 8254883: ZGC: Make the ZArrayIterator reusable for ZRelocationSetIterators
  • cb6167b: 8254557: Compiler crashes with java.lang.AssertionError: isSubtype UNKNOWN
  • 40f847e: 8227745: Enable Escape Analysis for Better Performance in the Presence of JVMTI Agents
  • f167a71: 8254264: Remove redundant cross_modify_fence()
  • 44f9271: 8254974: Fix stutter typo in TypeElement
  • ... and 119 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/d7128e7daceca8b3717f3a3cd2f7a6ddba6f215d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 20, 2020
@mrserb
Copy link
Member Author

mrserb commented Oct 21, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 21, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 21, 2020
@mrserb mrserb deleted the JDK-8231454 branch October 21, 2020 02:05
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2020

@mrserb Since your change was applied there have been 154 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 2ee2b4a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beans client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants