8235876: Misleading warning message in java source-file mode

[asotona]

Execution of java --source 7 Test.java displays following warning:
warning: [options] To suppress warnings about obsolete options, use -Xlint:-options.

However use of -Xlint:-options is not allowed and so it proposes an invalid suggestion.

This is yet another case of "too much information" provided to user in source-file mode.
Target audience of source-file mode are Java beginners with very simple cases.
Many options are not available in source-file mode and so this patch disables also related options warnings.

The case is similar to JDK-8268869

Patch adds -Xlint:-options into the list of default javac options in source-file mode.
Relevant test is also provided.

Thanks,
Adam

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8235876: Misleading warning message in java source-file mode

Reviewers

• Vicente Romero (@vicente-romero-oracle - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6537/head:pull/6537
$ git checkout pull/6537

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6537
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6537/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6537

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6537

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6537.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back asotona! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@asotona The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (237ca7d6)
• 00: Full (ede3e33f)

[vicente-romero-oracle]

lgtm

[openjdk]

@asotona This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8235876: Misleading warning message in java source-file mode

Reviewed-by: vromero

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0384739: 8276665: ObjectInputStream.GetField.get(name, object) should throw ClassNotFoundException
• cf7adae: 8275320: NMT should perform buffer overrun checks
• 96e3607: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator)
• 17e68ca: 8277042: add test for 8276036 to compiler/codecache

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[asotona]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 951247c.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 663e33d: 8272728: javac ignores any -J option in @argfiles silently
• 0384739: 8276665: ObjectInputStream.GetField.get(name, object) should throw ClassNotFoundException
• cf7adae: 8275320: NMT should perform buffer overrun checks
• 96e3607: 8275063: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API (Second incubator)
• 17e68ca: 8277042: add test for 8276036 to compiler/codecache

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@asotona Pushed as commit 951247c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.