-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8277803: vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/TypeComponent/isSynthetic/issynthetic001 fails with "Synthetic fields not found" #6601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back cushon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
…h "Synthetic fields not found"
dholmes-ora
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks,
David
|
@cushon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
sspitsyn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Liam,
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
Serguei
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 27299ea.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This change fixes
vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/TypeComponent/isSynthetic/issynthetic001after JDK-8271623.JDK-8271623 causes javac to omit a synthetic field from inner classes that do not reference their enclosing instance. The test was specifically checking for the presence of the synthetic field. To fix the test, this change adds an explicit reference to the enclosing instance of an inner class.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6601/head:pull/6601$ git checkout pull/6601Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6601$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6601/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6601View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6601Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6601.diff