-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8265150: AsyncGetCallTrace crashes on ResourceMark #6606
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Coleen,
This bypasses the currently observed problem, but we still have a fundamentally unsafe mechanism in use here. :(
Thanks,
David
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 166 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Does AsyncGetCallTrace get triggered asynchronously via signal? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Yes: C [libasyncProfiler.so+0x89b4] Profiler::getJavaTraceAsync(void*, ASGCT_CallFrame*, int)+0xd4
C [libasyncProfiler.so+0x9242] Profiler::recordSample(void*, unsigned long long, int, Event*)+0xd2
C [libasyncProfiler.so+0x34f2c] PerfEvents::signalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*)+0x8c |
What you could do is keep (on demand only) a secondary resource area per thread. On entering a context that may have been called by a signal handler, and with the current resource area in an unknown state, swap the current resource area pointer in Thread with that prepared secondary resource area, and upon leaving swap back. That way you never touch the original resource area. Kind of like double buffering for signal contexts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Coleen,
I'm okay with this work around.
Thanks,
Serguei
Definitely. I think having some assert code that verifies that we don't do anything "unsafe" while in AsyncGetCallTrace might be a good enhancement, but the definition of "unsafe" in this case might be almost anything we do. This change chops off a piece of the top of the iceberg as observed. Thanks for all the code reviews. |
Going to push as commit 267c024.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This change seems to keep the test case in the bug from crashing in the ResourceMark destructor. We have a ResourceMark during stack walking in AsyncGetCallTrace. Also RegisterMap during jvmti shouldn't process oops, fix care of @fisk.
Testing tier1-6 in progress.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6606/head:pull/6606
$ git checkout pull/6606
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6606
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6606/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6606
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6606
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6606.diff