8277628: Spec for InetAddressResolverProvider::get() throwing error or exception could be clearer

[AlekseiEfimov]

The following fix clarifies spec for InetAddressResolverProvider.get(Configuration) method to state that an error or exception thrown by this method will be propagated to to the caller of the method that triggered the lookup operation.

The InetAddressResolverProvider#system-wide-resolver class-level javadoc section has been updated to state the same.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8277628: Spec for InetAddressResolverProvider::get() throwing error or exception could be clearer

Reviewers

• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer)
• Daniel Fuchs (@dfuch - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6725/head:pull/6725
$ git checkout pull/6725

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6725
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6725/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6725

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6725

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6725.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back aefimov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@AlekseiEfimov The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (9d2e1267)

[AlanBateman]

The updated wording looks okay, I agree with the submitter that "calling thread" was a bit confusing.

[openjdk]

@AlekseiEfimov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277628: Spec for InetAddressResolverProvider::get() throwing error or exception could be clearer

Reviewed-by: alanb, dfuchs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 87 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 587e540: 8210558: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLock.java fails to find '^\s+- waiting to lock <0x[0-9a-f]+> (a java.lang.Class ...'
• 082fdf4: 8172065: javax/swing/JTree/4908142/bug4908142.java The selected index should be "aad"
• ab78187: 8277105: Inconsistent handling of missing permitted subclasses
• adf3952: 8277372: Add getters for BOT and card table members
• 7c6f57f: 8275610: C2: Object field load floats above its null check resulting in a segfault
• a885aab: 8276125: RunThese24H.java SIGSEGV in JfrThreadGroup::thread_group_id
• 6994d80: 8278291: compiler/uncommontrap/TraceDeoptimizationNoRealloc.java fails with release VMs after JDK-8154011
• 286a26c: 8278277: G1: Simplify implementation of G1GCPhaseTimes::record_or_add_time_secs
• d14f06a: 8278031: MultiThreadedRefCounter should not use relaxed atomic decrement
• 8d190dd: 8277496: Remove duplication in c1 Block successor lists
• ... and 77 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/37ff7f3b66eaa74d62d6a93f2f34ec744db21834...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[dfuch]

LGTM

[AlekseiEfimov]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit c609b5d.
Since your change was applied there have been 106 commits pushed to the master branch:

• bb50b92: 8277536: Use String.blank in jdk.javadoc where applicable
• 5b81d5e: 8276901: Implement UseHeavyMonitors consistently
• 69d8669: 8278339: ServerSocket::isClosed may return false after accept throws
• 56ca66e: 8277863: Deprecate sun.misc.Unsafe methods that return offsets
• 3536127: 8277383: VM.metaspace optionally show chunk freelist details
• 44fcee3: 8278289: Drop G1BlockOffsetTablePart::_object_can_span
• b2638e5: 8244602: Add JTREG_REPEAT_COUNT to repeat execution of a test
• 07669e3: 8275375: [REDO] JDK-8271949 dumppath in -XX:FlightRecorderOptions does not affect
• 24877ac: 8278270: ServerSocket is not thread safe
• e535cb3: 8272395: Bad HTML in JVMTI man page
• ... and 96 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/37ff7f3b66eaa74d62d6a93f2f34ec744db21834...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@AlekseiEfimov Pushed as commit c609b5d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.