8254811: JDK-8254158 broke ppc64, s390 builds

[TheRealMDoerr]

"frame::interpreter_frame_initial_sp_offset" is currently used in shared POSIX code, but doesn't exist on ppc64 and s390.
These platforms use frame pointers instead of initial sp for reserved zone checks. See comments in InterpreterMacroAssembler::remove_activation on these platforms. So we must not add any offset.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

	Linux x64	Windows x64	macOS x64
Build	✔️ (5/5 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1)	❌ (1/9 failed)	⏳ (1/9 running)	✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test task

• Linux x64 (langtools/tier1)

Issue

• JDK-8254811: JDK-8254158 broke ppc64, s390 builds

Reviewers

• Thomas Stuefe (@tstuefe - Reviewer)
• Goetz Lindenmaier (@GoeLin - Reviewer)

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/680/head:pull/680
$ git checkout pull/680

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (07687b3)

[tstuefe]

LGTM. Thanks for fixing this!

[GoeLin]

A pitty we need a #define now. But looks good. Thanks for fixing this.

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254811: JDK-8254158 broke ppc64, s390 builds

Reviewed-by: stuefe, goetz

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• cda22e3: 8254811: JDK-8254158 broke ppc64, s390 builds
• 8ef88e5: 8249878: jfr_emergency_dump has secondary crashes
• 3c2f5e0: 8254674: G1: Improve root location reference to dead obj verification message
• abe5137: 8254719: ZGC: Clean up includes

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[TheRealMDoerr]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8ef88e5: 8249878: jfr_emergency_dump has secondary crashes
• 3c2f5e0: 8254674: G1: Improve root location reference to dead obj verification message
• abe5137: 8254719: ZGC: Clean up includes

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit cda22e3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.