8278893: Parallel: Remove GCWorkerDelayMillis

[tschatzl]

Hi all,

can I have reviews for this change that removes the unnecessary and unused flag develop GCWorkerDelayMillis?

Testing: local compilation, gha

Thanks,
Thomas

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8278893: Parallel: Remove GCWorkerDelayMillis

Reviewers

• Albert Mingkun Yang (@albertnetymk - Reviewer)
• Hamlin Li (@Hamlin-Li - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6862/head:pull/6862
$ git checkout pull/6862

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6862
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6862/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6862

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6862

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6862.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (d88f34c4)

[openjdk]

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8278893: Parallel: Remove GCWorkerDelayMillis

Reviewed-by: ayang, mli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[tschatzl]

Thanks @albertnetymk @Hamlin-Li for your reviews.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit ff5d417.
Since your change was applied there have been 35 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5179672: 8278953: Clarify Class.getDeclaredConstructor specification
• 8549d8b: 8277100: Dynamic dump can inadvertently overwrite default CDS archive
• 4c78c9a: 8270929: Obsolete the FilterSpuriousWakeups flag in JDK 19
• 06206c7: 8278949: Cleanups for 8277850
• 31fbb87: 6462028: MaskFormatter API documentation refers to getDisplayValue
• 63e4303: 8278519: serviceability/jvmti/FieldAccessWatch/FieldAccessWatch.java failed "assert(handle != __null) failed: JNI handle should not be null"
• 6f0e8da: 8278871: [JVMCI] assert((uint)reason < 2* _trap_hist_limit) failed: oob
• 3c10b5d: 8278104: C1 should support the compiler directive 'BreakAtExecute'
• cc44e13: 8278623: compiler/vectorapi/reshape/TestVectorCastAVX512.java after JDK-8259610
• 905b763: 8261404: Class.getReflectionFactory() is not thread-safe
• ... and 25 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0bddd8af61b6c731f16b857c09de57ceefd72d06...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@tschatzl Pushed as commit ff5d417.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.