-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8279970: two AppCDS tests fail after JDK-8261455 #7070
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back minqi! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
|
Passed tier5 |
| System.out.println("This test is not applicable when JTREG tests are executed with -Xshare:off, or if the JDK doesn't have a default archive."); | ||
| return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: throw a SkippedException instead of System.out.println.
| System.out.println("This test is not applicable when JTREG tests are executed with -Xshare:off, or if the JDK doesn't have a default archive."); | ||
| return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same suggestion as above.
calvinccheung
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look okay. One suggestion below.
|
We're seeing 7 failures due to this issue per Tier5. Is there an ETA for |
|
Tap, tap, tap... is this thing working? What's the ETA for when this |
|
@yminqi - You'll want to merge 'master' into this branch and then update |
…failed due to base archive not in consistency, fixed with correct options to dump
calvinccheung
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updates look good.
|
@yminqi This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
iklam
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
@iklam @calvinccheung Thanks for review! |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit b0496b0.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please review
The failure of the two tests is from jtreg run with -Xshare:off, the arguments caused confusion with the test cases. In fact they should be avoided to run with CDS is disabled.
Tests: tier5 (in testing)
Manually repeat the test failure in local jtreg, and passed jtreg in local.
Thanks
Yumin
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7070/head:pull/7070$ git checkout pull/7070Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7070$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7070/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7070View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7070Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7070.diff