Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8280401: [sspi] gss_accept_sec_context leaves output_token uninitialized #7163

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wangweij
Copy link
Contributor

@wangweij wangweij commented Jan 20, 2022

Set output_token to empty. It is always accessed (even for a GSS_S_FAILURE) at

return getJavaBuffer(env, &outToken);
.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8280401: [sspi] gss_accept_sec_context leaves output_token uninitialized

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7163/head:pull/7163
$ git checkout pull/7163

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7163
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7163/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7163

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7163

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7163.diff

8280401: [sspi] gss_accept_sec_context leaves output_token uninitialized
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 20, 2022

👋 Welcome back weijun! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 20, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2022

@wangweij The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 20, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 20, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link

@valeriepeng valeriepeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good. Remember to add the noreg-xxx label. Thanks~

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2022

@wangweij This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280401: [sspi] gss_accept_sec_context leaves output_token uninitialized

Reviewed-by: valeriep

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 58 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 35ee0f3: 8258814: Compilation logging crashes for thread suspension / debugging tests
  • 293fb46: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms
  • 2426d58: 8278472: Invalid value set to CANDIDATEFORM structure
  • 02390c7: 8279282: [vectorapi] Matcher::supports_vector_comparison_unsigned is not needed on x86
  • 3419ff7: 8277535: Remove redundant Stream.distinct()/sorted() steps
  • d48279b: 8279009: CDS crashes when the source of an InstanceKlass is NULL
  • 9636502: 8279008: G1: Calculate BOT threshold on-the-fly during Object Copy phase
  • 0ea2b39: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters
  • ec8b6ac: 8234682: The order of @param in the generated docs should match the method signature
  • a4d2019: 8280178: Remove os:: API's that just call system API's
  • ... and 48 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/98d96a770756ffe3e7f5e4b82120e9fb484cad9a...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 21, 2022
@wangweij
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2022

Going to push as commit 6352c02.
Since your change was applied there have been 58 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 35ee0f3: 8258814: Compilation logging crashes for thread suspension / debugging tests
  • 293fb46: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms
  • 2426d58: 8278472: Invalid value set to CANDIDATEFORM structure
  • 02390c7: 8279282: [vectorapi] Matcher::supports_vector_comparison_unsigned is not needed on x86
  • 3419ff7: 8277535: Remove redundant Stream.distinct()/sorted() steps
  • d48279b: 8279009: CDS crashes when the source of an InstanceKlass is NULL
  • 9636502: 8279008: G1: Calculate BOT threshold on-the-fly during Object Copy phase
  • 0ea2b39: 8280363: Minor correction of ALPN specification in SSLParameters
  • ec8b6ac: 8234682: The order of @param in the generated docs should match the method signature
  • a4d2019: 8280178: Remove os:: API's that just call system API's
  • ... and 48 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/98d96a770756ffe3e7f5e4b82120e9fb484cad9a...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2022

@wangweij Pushed as commit 6352c02.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
2 participants