Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8280784: VM_Cleanup unnecessarily processes all thread oops #7246

Conversation

stefank
Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank commented Jan 27, 2022

While looking at ZGC latencies in a benchmark with >20000 Java threads, I noticed that the Cleanup VM operation could take up to 500 ms. It turned out that the time was spent processing the oops in all Java threads. Since none of the safepoint cleanup tasks use the oops in the threads, I propose that we stop processing the oops in this VM Operation.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8280784: VM_Cleanup unnecessarily processes all thread oops

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7246/head:pull/7246
$ git checkout pull/7246

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7246
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7246/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7246

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7246

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7246.diff

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 27, 2022

/label add hotspot

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 27, 2022

Tested with Oracle tier1-3

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 27, 2022

👋 Welcome back stefank! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org labels Jan 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 27, 2022

@stefank
The hotspot label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 27, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 27, 2022

@stefank This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280784: VM_Cleanup unnecessarily processes all thread oops

Reviewed-by: eosterlund, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cab5905: 8280583: Always build NMT
  • 7f68759: 8280719: G1: Remove outdated comment in RemoveSelfForwardPtrObjClosure::apply
  • 94380d0: 8278232: [macos] Wrong chars emitted when entering certain char-sequence of Indic language

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 27, 2022
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine, but doesn't that apply to other "empty" VMOps: VM_None, VM_ForceSafepoint, VM_ThreadSuspend, etc? Probably some code commoning is in order there...

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 27, 2022

@shipilev Yeah, probably. None of the listed VM operations seemed time-sensitive to me, so I left them as-is. But I'll try to unify this and re-run the tests.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev Yeah, probably. None of the listed VM operations seemed time-sensitive to me, so I left them as-is. But I'll try to unify this and re-run the tests.

No need to do the unification here, I think. This point change is cleanly backportable. Unification in some future RFR would be nice.

@stefank
Copy link
Member Author

stefank commented Jan 28, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

Going to push as commit 8a3cca0.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 973dda5: 8280804: Parallel: Remove unused variables in PSPromotionManager::drain_stacks_depth
  • 55f180f: 8280004: DCmdArgument::parse_value() should handle NULL input
  • 178ac74: 8251466: test/java/io/File/GetXSpace.java fails on Windows with mapped network drives.
  • a1d1e47: 8280823: Remove NULL check in DumpTimeClassInfo::is_excluded
  • 094db1a: 8277948: AArch64: Print the correct native stack if -XX:+PreserveFramePointer when crash
  • 7857405: 8280744: Allow SuppressWarnings to be used in all declaration contexts
  • 40a2ce2: 8270476: Make floating-point test infrastructure more lambda and method reference friendly
  • 6d242e4: 8280835: jdk/javadoc/tool/CheckManPageOptions.java depends on source hierarchy
  • ece89c6: 8280366: (fs) Restore Files.createTempFile javadoc
  • b94ebaa: 8280686: Remove Compile::print_method_impl
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/0dba1707910734d03c318424764b8682b028a8e0...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 28, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 28, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@stefank Pushed as commit 8a3cca0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants