New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8280767: -XX:ArchiveClassesAtExit does not archive BoundMethodHandle$Species classes #7329
Conversation
👋 Welcome back minqi! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
/label remove hotspot |
@yminqi |
@yminqi |
Webrevs
|
…e for is_hidden_lambda_proxy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. A small nit on the comments.
@@ -1415,6 +1415,10 @@ InstanceKlass* SystemDictionaryShared::find_builtin_class(Symbol* name) { | |||
if (record != NULL) { | |||
assert(!record->_klass->is_hidden(), "hidden class cannot be looked up by name"); | |||
assert(check_alignment(record->_klass), "Address not aligned"); | |||
// The regenerated lamdbda Holder classes are not saved, should avoid call CFLH |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it will be clear to say
// We did not save the classfile data of the regenerated LambdaForm invoker classes,
// so we cannot support CLFH for such classes.
@yminqi This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
.assertNormalExit(output -> { | ||
output.shouldContain("java.lang.invoke.BoundMethodHandle$Species_JL source: shared objects file (top)"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a comment indicating the "species" class is from the "CDSLambdaInvoker" test program.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Please add a comment in the test case.
@iklam @calvinccheung Thanks for review |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 8e4ef81.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi, Please review
When do dynamic dump, the call to LambdaForInvolkers::append_filtered for generating lambda holder classes will only allow the result which matches the filtering list to be added . This filters out the SPECIES method handle holder classes, and they won't be archived in dynamic shared archive. The patch is doing followings:
Tests: tier1,tier4
Thanks
Yumin
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7329/head:pull/7329
$ git checkout pull/7329
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7329
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7329/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7329
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7329
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7329.diff