8254976: Re-enable swing jtreg tests which were broken due to samevm mode

[prsadhuk]

Few tests were problemlisted in an earlier test sprint due to those failing in mach5 testing.
It was found out that these test were failing due to those jtreg tests being run in same vm mode.
The bug was fixed by the adding client tests to the "othervm.dirs" in the TEST.ROOT so there is no need to keep those tests problem listed.
mach5 job running these tests was ok. Link in JBS.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

	Linux x64	Windows x64	macOS x64
Build	⏳ (5/5 running)	⏳ (2/2 running)	⏳ (2/2 running)

Issue

• JDK-8254976: Re-enable swing jtreg tests which were broken due to samevm mode

Reviewers

• Sergey Bylokhov (@mrserb - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 2354ad1

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/733/head:pull/733
$ git checkout pull/733

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@prsadhuk To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• 2d
• awt
• beans
• build
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah
• sound
• swing

[prsadhuk]

/label add swing

[openjdk]

@prsadhuk
The swing label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 02: Full - Incremental (868cea7)
• 01: Full - Incremental (2354ad1)
• 00: Full (6431d70)

[prrace]

Since this re-enables quite a few tests, please can we run the jtreg desktop tests several times on each platform to be
sure it is at least moderately stable. If we get breakage out of this it there'll be a bunch of candidates !

[prsadhuk]

I have rerun the open jtreg tests several times (link in JBS) and those are stable apart from one test which I have added back.

[openjdk]

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254976: Re-enable swing jtreg tests which were broken due to samevm mode

Reviewed-by: serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 114 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2e510e0: 8255043: Incorrectly styled copyright text
• 6bd05b1: 8255074: sun.nio.fs.WindowsPath::getPathForWin32Calls synchronizes on String object
• 9e9f5e6: 8017179: [macosx] list1 and list2 vistble item isn't desired
• 2ee2b4a: 8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo
• 42a6ead: 8254884: Make sure jvm does not crash with Arm SVE and Vector API
• e5870cf: 8252133: The java/awt/GraphicsDevice/DisplayModes/CycleDMImage.java fails if metal pipeline is active
• afc967f: 8254783: jpackage fails on Windows when application name differs from installer name
• 3ccf487: 8253019: Enhanced JPEG decoding
• cfb02d4: 8250861: Crash in MinINode::Ideal(PhaseGVN*, bool)
• 0d35235: 8249927: Specify limits of jdk.serialProxyInterfaceLimit
• ... and 104 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/038f58d4f0782f885547d2b052a47fdf2229cfe3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[prsadhuk]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@prsadhuk Since your change was applied there have been 114 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2e510e0: 8255043: Incorrectly styled copyright text
• 6bd05b1: 8255074: sun.nio.fs.WindowsPath::getPathForWin32Calls synchronizes on String object
• 9e9f5e6: 8017179: [macosx] list1 and list2 vistble item isn't desired
• 2ee2b4a: 8231454: File lock in Windows on a loaded jar due to a leak in Introspector::getBeanInfo
• 42a6ead: 8254884: Make sure jvm does not crash with Arm SVE and Vector API
• e5870cf: 8252133: The java/awt/GraphicsDevice/DisplayModes/CycleDMImage.java fails if metal pipeline is active
• afc967f: 8254783: jpackage fails on Windows when application name differs from installer name
• 3ccf487: 8253019: Enhanced JPEG decoding
• cfb02d4: 8250861: Crash in MinINode::Ideal(PhaseGVN*, bool)
• 0d35235: 8249927: Specify limits of jdk.serialProxyInterfaceLimit
• ... and 104 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/038f58d4f0782f885547d2b052a47fdf2229cfe3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 1b7ddeb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.