Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8278067: Make HttpURLConnection default keep alive timeout configurable #7349

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

Michael-Mc-Mahon
Copy link
Member

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Michael-Mc-Mahon commented Feb 4, 2022

Hi,

Could I get the following patch reviewed please? (A CSR is also required which I will submit when the docs are agreed)

It adds a pair of new system properties to make the keep alive timer in java.net.HttpURLConnection configurable.
The proposed property names are:

"http.keepAlive.time.server" and "http.keepAlive.time.proxy"

Thanks,
Michael


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed
  • Change requires a CSR request to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8278067: Make HttpURLConnection default keep alive timeout configurable
  • JDK-8281828: Make HttpURLConnection default keep alive timeout configurable (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7349/head:pull/7349
$ git checkout pull/7349

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7349
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7349/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7349

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7349

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7349.diff

@Michael-Mc-Mahon
Copy link
Member Author

/csr needed

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 4, 2022

👋 Welcome back michaelm! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Feb 4, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2022

@Michael-Mc-Mahon has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.
@Michael-Mc-Mahon please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8278067. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 4, 2022

@Michael-Mc-Mahon The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the net net-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 4, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 4, 2022

Webrevs

v = new ClientVector(keepAliveTimeout > 0 ?
keepAliveTimeout * 1000 : LIFETIME);
if (keepAliveTimeout == 0) {
keepAliveTimeout = getUserKeepAlive(http.getUsingProxy());
Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch Feb 4, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be 0 if -Dhttp.keepAlive.time.xxx=0 was specified which would result in an assert below.
Also I am not sure I understand the logic of having same 5s timeout for server & proxy if nothing was specified anywhere, but having a different value for proxy & server if the server specified keep-alive without providing a value.
Where does that come from?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I meant to catch that case as well in the method where the property is read. Probably should be documented as well.

The other behavior is just maintaining the present behavior, purely for compatibility reasons.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! I'd missed that.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Feb 16, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 16, 2022

@Michael-Mc-Mahon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8278067: Make HttpURLConnection default keep alive timeout configurable

Reviewed-by: dfuchs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 24 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0af356b: 8278173: [vectorapi] Add x64 intrinsics for unsigned (zero extended) casts
  • a24498b: 8281771: Crash in java_lang_invoke_MethodType::print_signature
  • 1aff44b: 8279949: JavaThread::_free_handle_block leaks native memory
  • 394ce5f: 8280825: Modules that "provide" ToolProvider should document the name that can be used
  • 745f7e7: 8281186: runtime/cds/appcds/DumpingWithNoCoops.java fails
  • 1870465: 8281744: x86: Use short jumps in TIG::set_vtos_entry_points
  • 2fe0bf6: 8281748: runtime/logging/RedefineClasses.java failed "assert(addr != __null) failed: invariant"
  • bc61484: 8280136: Serial: Remove unnecessary use of ExpandHeap_lock
  • 2112a9d: 8246033: bin/print_config.js script uses nashorn jjs tool
  • 1c12b15: 8281741: [testbug] PrintIdealPhaseTest fails with -Xcomp
  • ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/95f198b2b1b2d5437515dc837cc160e4224c0ff3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 16, 2022
@Michael-Mc-Mahon
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 16, 2022

Going to push as commit d8f44aa.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7428b37: 8281948: JFR: Parser skips too many bytes for fractional types
  • d5b4666: 8281829: runtime/CommandLine/OptionsValidation/TestOptionsWithRanges.java fails after JDK-8281467
  • fef5d74: 8281812: x86: Use short jumps in TemplateTable::condy_helper
  • a86cab8: 8236136: tests which use CompilationMode shouldn't be run w/ TieredStopAtLevel
  • 0af356b: 8278173: [vectorapi] Add x64 intrinsics for unsigned (zero extended) casts
  • a24498b: 8281771: Crash in java_lang_invoke_MethodType::print_signature
  • 1aff44b: 8279949: JavaThread::_free_handle_block leaks native memory
  • 394ce5f: 8280825: Modules that "provide" ToolProvider should document the name that can be used
  • 745f7e7: 8281186: runtime/cds/appcds/DumpingWithNoCoops.java fails
  • 1870465: 8281744: x86: Use short jumps in TIG::set_vtos_entry_points
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/95f198b2b1b2d5437515dc837cc160e4224c0ff3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 16, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 16, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 16, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 16, 2022

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Pushed as commit d8f44aa.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@Michael-Mc-Mahon Michael-Mc-Mahon deleted the keepalive branch February 16, 2022 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants