Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8281744: x86: Use short jumps in TIG::set_vtos_entry_points #7463

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Feb 14, 2022

Performance in -Xint mode seems to be bottlenecked on the code size, rather than particular instruction hotspots, which means code density is important.

There are forward branches in TemplateInterpreterGenerator::set_vtos_entry_points, which cannot be shortened by MacroAssembler, unless we tell it specifically that the upcoming branch target would be within the 8-bit offset. Which it apparently is in this particular case, because there are just a handful of push-es between the jump and its target. If a jump offset is more than 8 bits, the interpreter would catch fire just about everywhere, since set_vtos_entry_points is used at every bytecode entry. fastdebug builds assert the offset sanity directly.

Current patch improves SPECjvm2008 performance in -Xint mode on Ryzen 7 5700G:

compiler.compiler: +4.1%
compiler.sunflow: +4.7%
compress: +9.9%
crypto.signverify: +5.2%
scimark.fft.large: +9.5%
scimark.fft.small: +10.1%
serial: +7.3%
xml.transform: +7.1%
xml.validation: +3.3%

There are other places in template interpreter where forward jumps can be short, I'll do them separately, since they are riskier and also less important.

Additional testing:

  • Linux x86_64 fastdebug, tier1
  • Linux x86_32 fastdebug, tier1

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8281744: x86: Use short jumps in TIG::set_vtos_entry_points

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7463/head:pull/7463
$ git checkout pull/7463

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7463
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7463/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7463

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7463

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7463.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 14, 2022

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2022

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 14, 2022
@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2022 17:02
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 14, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 14, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@robehn robehn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 14, 2022

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8281744: x86: Use short jumps in TIG::set_vtos_entry_points

Reviewed-by: rehn, coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 37 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b156462: 8281467: Allow larger OptoLoopAlignment and CodeEntryAlignment
  • f33329e: 8016524: [macosx] Bottom line is not visible for JTableHeader
  • d4cd8df: 8281634: jdeps: java.lang.InternalError: Missing message: err.invalid.filters
  • 1a7b70a: 8269091: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/SetPositionHang.java failed with ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array index out of range: -4
  • 16f649b: 8281678: appcds/dynamicArchive/ArchiveConsistency.java fails after JDK-8279997
  • 88fc3bf: 8280473: CI: Support unresolved JVM_CONSTANT_Dynamic constant pool entries
  • f07b816: 8280940: gtest os.release_multi_mappings_vm is racy
  • 9d0a4c3: 8274238: Inconsistent type for young_list_target_length()
  • 2604a88: 8281585: Remove unused imports under test/lib and jtreg/gc
  • 534e557: 8256368: Avoid repeated upcalls into Java to re-resolve MH/VH linkers/invokers
  • ... and 27 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/3a13425bc9088cbb6d95e1a46248d7eba27fb1a6...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 14, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 15, 2022

Going to push as commit 1870465.
Since your change was applied there have been 45 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2fe0bf6: 8281748: runtime/logging/RedefineClasses.java failed "assert(addr != __null) failed: invariant"
  • bc61484: 8280136: Serial: Remove unnecessary use of ExpandHeap_lock
  • 2112a9d: 8246033: bin/print_config.js script uses nashorn jjs tool
  • 1c12b15: 8281741: [testbug] PrintIdealPhaseTest fails with -Xcomp
  • f82866b: 8281555: [macos] Get rid of deprecated Style Masks constants
  • 8819f45: 8281722: Removal of PrintIdealLevel
  • 622970e: 8281728: Redundant null check in LineNumberInputStream.read
  • 11f943d: 8280916: Simplify HotSpot Style Guide editorial changes
  • b156462: 8281467: Allow larger OptoLoopAlignment and CodeEntryAlignment
  • f33329e: 8016524: [macosx] Bottom line is not visible for JTableHeader
  • ... and 35 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/3a13425bc9088cbb6d95e1a46248d7eba27fb1a6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 15, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 15, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 15, 2022

@shipilev Pushed as commit 1870465.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8281744-int-short-jmps branch March 7, 2022 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants