-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8281771: Crash in java_lang_invoke_MethodType::print_signature #7470
Conversation
👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Leonid,
Looks good.
Thanks,
David
@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missed the spot?
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Shipilëv <shade@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch @shipilev !
/integrate |
Going to push as commit a24498b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
The crash happens in java.lang.invoke.MethodType. when VM tries to print this objec while rtype and ptypes are not initialized yet. So the fix is just to check if they are not NULL.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7470/head:pull/7470
$ git checkout pull/7470
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7470
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7470/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7470
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7470
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7470.diff