Skip to content

8280964: [Linux aarch64] : drawImage dithers TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED images incorrectly #7563

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

prrace
Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace commented Feb 21, 2022

As per the bug evaluation, the root of this issue is that on this platform "char" is treated as "unsigned char"
and the code here expects it to be "signed char", so we need to make it explicitly so.
For all other supported platforms this is a no-op since that is the default elsewhere.
So this should be a safe fix, and the updated JDK has been tested on all platforms.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8280964: [Linux aarch64] : drawImage dithers TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED images incorrectly

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7563/head:pull/7563
$ git checkout pull/7563

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7563
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7563/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7563

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7563

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7563.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 21, 2022

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2022

@prrace The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 21, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 21, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2022

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280964: [Linux aarch64] : drawImage dithers TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED images incorrectly

Reviewed-by: serb, dmarkov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e0b4962: 8282190: Typo in javadoc of java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter#getDecimalStyle
  • e1c98bd: 8281523: Accessibility: Conversion from string literal loses const qualifier
  • cc7cf81: 8280861: Robot color picker broken on Linux with scaling above 100%
  • d7a706a: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis
  • bdae1d8: 8282147: [TESTBUG] waitForIdle after creating frame in JSpinnerMouseAndKeyPressTest.java
  • 51f4420: 8282130: (bf) Remove unused ARRAY_BASE_OFFSET, ARRAY_INDEX_SCALE from read-only Heap Buffers
  • 34aae32: 8282166: JDK-8282158 changed ECParameters' package by accident
  • c5d9142: 8282096: G1: Remove redundant checks in G1CardSet::free_mem_object
  • 52a85d8: 8282158: ECParameters InvalidParameterSpecException messages missed ECKeySizeParameterSpec
  • 4e0b81c: 8281544: assert(VM_Version::supports_avx512bw()) failed for Tests jdk/incubator/vector/
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/d7f31d0d53bfec627edc83ceb75fc6202891e186...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 22, 2022
@prrace
Copy link
Contributor Author

prrace commented Feb 23, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 23, 2022

Going to push as commit 6f882de.
Since your change was applied there have been 25 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2557ef8: 8282276: Problem list failing two Robot Screen Capture tests
  • 6445ee4: 5041655: (ch) FileLock: negative param and overflow issues
  • 7feabee: 8261407: ReflectionFactory.checkInitted() is not thread-safe
  • 58e1882: 8282042: [testbug] FileEncodingTest.java depends on default encoding
  • 3cb3867: 8281315: Unicode, (?i) flag and backreference throwing IndexOutOfBounds Exception
  • 957dae0: 8280958: G1/Parallel: Unify marking code structure
  • e44d067: 8244593: Clean up GNM/NM after JEP 381
  • 41355e2: 8276686: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in /java/util/regex/Pattern.java
  • 022d807: 8271008: appcds/*/MethodHandlesAsCollectorTest.java tests time out because of excessive GC (CodeCache GC Threshold) in loom
  • ab6d8e6: 8260328: Drop redundant CSS properties from java.desktop HTML files
  • ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/d7f31d0d53bfec627edc83ceb75fc6202891e186...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 23, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 23, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 23, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 23, 2022

@prrace Pushed as commit 6f882de.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants