Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8282295: SymbolPropertyEntry::set_method_type fails with assert #7730

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Mar 7, 2022

This is somewhat trivial change to zero out OopHandle in fullgc_alot_dummy_array. Other OopHandle releases are for data that is deallocated or not reused so zeroing _obj is not needed in those places. I didn't want to zero _obj in OopHandle::release anyway without zeroing it in the analogous WeakHandle::release. WeakHandle release code operates on const objects, also which are deallocated after release.
Tested with tier1-4.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8282295: SymbolPropertyEntry::set_method_type fails with assert

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7730/head:pull/7730
$ git checkout pull/7730

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/7730
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/7730/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 7730

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 7730

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7730.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 7, 2022

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 7, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 7, 2022

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 7, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 7, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@hseigel hseigel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks good and trivial.
Thanks, Harold

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2022

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282295: SymbolPropertyEntry::set_method_type fails with assert

Reviewed-by: hseigel

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0cbc4b8: 8281266: [JVMCI] MetaUtil.toInternalName() doesn't handle hidden classes correctly
  • 0f88fc1: 8282769: BSD date cannot handle all ISO 8601 formats
  • c6d743f: 8282770: Set source date in jib profiles from buildId
  • 5fab27e: 8282144: RandomSupport.convertSeedBytesToLongs sign extension overwrites previous bytes
  • 65ca0a5: 8276333: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java failed "assert(!contains(edge->reference())) failed: invariant"
  • e607287: 8282728: Serial: Remove unused BlockOffsetArray::Action
  • 8b45dbd: 8282312: Minor corrections to evbroadcasti32x4 intrinsic on x86
  • 3f0684d: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes
  • cde923d: 8282690: runtime/CommandLine/VMDeprecatedOptions.java fails after JDK-8281181
  • 50eb915: 8282632: Cleanup unnecessary calls to Throwable.initCause() in java.security.jgss
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/894ffb098c80bfeb4209038c017d01dbf53fac0f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 8, 2022
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Mar 8, 2022

Thanks Harold!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2022

Going to push as commit 3e4dfc6.
Since your change was applied there have been 23 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0cbc4b8: 8281266: [JVMCI] MetaUtil.toInternalName() doesn't handle hidden classes correctly
  • 0f88fc1: 8282769: BSD date cannot handle all ISO 8601 formats
  • c6d743f: 8282770: Set source date in jib profiles from buildId
  • 5fab27e: 8282144: RandomSupport.convertSeedBytesToLongs sign extension overwrites previous bytes
  • 65ca0a5: 8276333: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java failed "assert(!contains(edge->reference())) failed: invariant"
  • e607287: 8282728: Serial: Remove unused BlockOffsetArray::Action
  • 8b45dbd: 8282312: Minor corrections to evbroadcasti32x4 intrinsic on x86
  • 3f0684d: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes
  • cde923d: 8282690: runtime/CommandLine/VMDeprecatedOptions.java fails after JDK-8281181
  • 50eb915: 8282632: Cleanup unnecessary calls to Throwable.initCause() in java.security.jgss
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/894ffb098c80bfeb4209038c017d01dbf53fac0f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2022

@coleenp Pushed as commit 3e4dfc6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@coleenp coleenp deleted the invoke branch March 8, 2022 17:34
_fullgc_alot_dummy_array.release(Universe::vm_global());
_fullgc_alot_dummy_array = OopHandle(); // NULL out OopStorage pointer.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems odd that there is not a way to NULL the pointer directly - why is it not done as part of release()?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants