Skip to content

8232024: Don't pollute log output with multiple errors of the same type #784

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle commented Oct 21, 2020

Don't run ldd and build list of dependency packages in case jpackage builds DEB package on non Debian Linux and RPM on Debian Linux. In this cases attempts to detect what packages provide libs will fail anyways, so don't waste time and pollute jpackage log output.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Issue

  • JDK-8232024: Don't pollute log output with multiple errors of the same type

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/784/head:pull/784
$ git checkout pull/784

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 21, 2020

👋 Welcome back asemenyuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 21, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2020

@alexeysemenyukoracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 21, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 21, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@alexeysemenyukoracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8232024: Don't pollute log output with multiple errors of the same type

Reviewed-by: almatvee, herrick

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 170 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cc86113: 8255271: Avoid generating duplicate interpreter entries for subword types
  • 5ec1b80: 8255287: aarch64: fix SVE patterns for vector shift count
  • 12daf2b: 8255340: [s390] build failure after JDK-8255208
  • 9007bc2: 8255129: [PPC64, s390] Check vector_size_supported and add VectorReinterpret node
  • df79257: 8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched
  • 55a0cad: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c
  • ac1748e: 8254670: SVE test uses linux-specific api
  • 0e92053: 8254286: Wrong inference in switch expression with "null" arm
  • 63ce304: 8249675: x86: frequency extraction from cpu brand string is incomplete
  • e52156d: 8255067: Restore Copyright line in file modified by 8253191
  • ... and 160 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/038f58d4f0782f885547d2b052a47fdf2229cfe3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 23, 2020
@alexeysemenyukoracle
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@alexeysemenyukoracle Since your change was applied there have been 171 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit cf821b0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@alexeysemenyukoracle alexeysemenyukoracle deleted the JDK-8232024 branch November 19, 2020 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants