JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions #795

tstuefe · 2020-10-22T04:21:30Z

Hi,

may I please have reviews for this small cleanup / fix?

While reviewing JDK-8253717 it was found that comments would help with understanding the StackOverFlow class. Especially the fact that the various base are actually pointing outside their respective zone, since the stack grows downward and a zone (and the stack itself) range is [end, base). If you don't look at this code daily it can be surprising.

This also fixes some small off-by-one errors in various "in_stack_xxx_zone()" methods which test whether a given address is inside a zone and gave wrong results for address=base since base points outside its zone. This had the effect that an address could be in multiple zones.

Finally it adds a small gtest which tests the StackOverFlow methods.

/issue: JDK-8254189

Progress

Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
Commit message must refer to an issue
Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

	Linux x32	Linux x64	Windows x64	macOS x64
Build	✔️ (1/1 passed)	✔️ (5/5 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)	✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1)		✔️ (9/9 passed)	❌ (1/9 failed)	✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test task

Windows x64 (hs/tier1 compiler)

Issue

JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions

Reviewers

David Holmes (@dholmes-ora - Reviewer)
Gerard Ziemski (@gerard-ziemski - Committer) ⚠️ Review applies to cc54ef8

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/795/head:pull/795
$ git checkout pull/795

bridgekeeper · 2020-10-22T04:22:41Z

👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

openjdk · 2020-10-22T04:24:56Z

@tstuefe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

mlbridge · 2020-10-26T15:16:22Z

Webrevs

dholmes-ora

Hi Thomas,

Seems okay.

One nit below.

Thanks,
David

src/hotspot/share/runtime/stackOverflow.cpp

openjdk · 2020-10-27T01:35:02Z

@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions

Reviewed-by: dholmes, gziemski

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 125 new commits pushed to the master branch:

caec8d2: 8233560: [TESTBUG] ToolTipManager/Test6256140.java is failing on macos
a5b42ec: 8233570: [TESTBUG] HTMLEditorKit test bug5043626.java is failing on macos
7e305ad: 8255405: sun/net/ftp/imp/FtpClient uses SimpleDateFormat in not thread-safe manner
d82a6dc: 8255438: [Vector API] More instructs in x86.ad should use legacy mode for code-gen
1a5e6c9: 8253101: Clean up CallStaticJavaNode EA flags
a7595b2: 8250669: Running JMH micros is broken after JDK-8248135
edd1988: 8255530: Additional cleanup after JDK-8235710 (elliptic curve removal)
790d6e2: 8255533: Incorrect javadoc in DateTimeFormatterBuilder.appendPattern() for 'uu'/'yy'
3f20612: 8255555: Bad copyright headers in SocketChannelCompare.java SocketChannelConnectionSetup.java UnixSocketChannelReadWrite.java
42fc158: 8253939: [TESTBUG] Increase coverage of the cgroups detection code
... and 115 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/da97ab5c8a4f6d54c322bed133d5dc551bdd2de1...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

tstuefe · 2020-10-28T10:22:38Z

Ping... May I have a second review please? Its quite trivial.
Patch was tested in our internal systems and no problems surfaced.

gerard-ziemski · 2020-10-28T15:26:17Z

Very nice.

Personally I'd like to see additional:

ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_red_zone(so.stack_end()));
ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_yellow_zone(so.stack_red_zone_base()));
ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_reserved_zone(so.stack_yellow_zone_base()));

in the test, to drive home the point of the inclusion of the ranges, but that's a tiny nick pick.

tstuefe · 2020-10-28T16:28:02Z

Very nice.

Thank you, Gerard.

Personally I'd like to see additional:

ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_red_zone(so.stack_end()));
ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_yellow_zone(so.stack_red_zone_base()));
ASSERT_TRUE(so.in_stack_reserved_zone(so.stack_yellow_zone_base()));

in the test, to drive home the point of the inclusion of the ranges, but that's a tiny nick pick.

I can do this. Will have to reshape those a bit since there is no "in_yellow_zone" (I considered adding one for tests sake but then did not).

...Thomas

tstuefe · 2020-10-28T17:17:18Z

... and StackOverFlow::stack_end() is private, so I cannot use it in ASSERT either...

tstuefe · 2020-10-29T06:29:24Z

/integrate

openjdk · 2020-10-29T06:31:40Z

@tstuefe Since your change was applied there have been 125 commits pushed to the master branch:

caec8d2: 8233560: [TESTBUG] ToolTipManager/Test6256140.java is failing on macos
a5b42ec: 8233570: [TESTBUG] HTMLEditorKit test bug5043626.java is failing on macos
7e305ad: 8255405: sun/net/ftp/imp/FtpClient uses SimpleDateFormat in not thread-safe manner
d82a6dc: 8255438: [Vector API] More instructs in x86.ad should use legacy mode for code-gen
1a5e6c9: 8253101: Clean up CallStaticJavaNode EA flags
a7595b2: 8250669: Running JMH micros is broken after JDK-8248135
edd1988: 8255530: Additional cleanup after JDK-8235710 (elliptic curve removal)
790d6e2: 8255533: Incorrect javadoc in DateTimeFormatterBuilder.appendPattern() for 'uu'/'yy'
3f20612: 8255555: Bad copyright headers in SocketChannelCompare.java SocketChannelConnectionSetup.java UnixSocketChannelReadWrite.java
42fc158: 8253939: [TESTBUG] Increase coverage of the cgroups detection code
... and 115 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/da97ab5c8a4f6d54c322bed133d5dc551bdd2de1...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 4031cb4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

coleenp · 2020-10-29T11:56:11Z

Sorry for not getting to this review on time. Thank you for doing this and writing the gtest. This is really nice.

tstuefe added 2 commits October 21, 2020 14:32

Initial patch

a3065b1

Remove accidental newline

8c12882

openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 22, 2020

tstuefe marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2020 15:11

openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 26, 2020

dholmes-ora approved these changes Oct 27, 2020

View reviewed changes

src/hotspot/share/runtime/stackOverflow.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 27, 2020

Feedback David

cc54ef8

dholmes-ora approved these changes Oct 27, 2020

View reviewed changes

gerard-ziemski approved these changes Oct 28, 2020

View reviewed changes

Feedback Gerard

89f21f1

dholmes-ora approved these changes Oct 29, 2020

View reviewed changes

openjdk bot closed this Oct 29, 2020

openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 29, 2020

tstuefe deleted the JDK-8254189 branch November 2, 2020 13:51

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions #795

JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions #795

tstuefe commented Oct 22, 2020 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2020

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2020

mlbridge bot commented Oct 26, 2020 •

edited

Loading

dholmes-ora left a comment

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2020 •

edited

Loading

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

gerard-ziemski commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 29, 2020

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2020

coleenp commented Oct 29, 2020

JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions #795

JDK-8254189: Improve comments for StackOverFlow and fix in_xxx() functions #795

Conversation

tstuefe commented Oct 22, 2020 • edited by openjdk bot Loading

Progress

Testing

Issue

Reviewers

Download

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2020

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2020

mlbridge bot commented Oct 26, 2020 • edited Loading

Webrevs

dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2020 • edited Loading

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

gerard-ziemski commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 28, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 29, 2020

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2020

coleenp commented Oct 29, 2020

tstuefe commented Oct 22, 2020 •

edited by openjdk bot

Loading

mlbridge bot commented Oct 26, 2020 •

edited

Loading

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2020 •

edited

Loading