Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8255225: compiler/aot tests fail on Windows with NPE during artifact resolution #800

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Oct 22, 2020

Bisection shows it started to happen after JDK-8253660. I believe toString() there is not very resilient in the face of null causes.

Example output:

$ make run-test TEST=compiler/aot

STDERR:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Throwable.getCause()" because "<local1>" is null
at jdk.test.lib.artifacts.ArtifactResolverException.getRootCause(ArtifactResolverException.java:22)
at jdk.test.lib.artifacts.ArtifactResolverException.toString(ArtifactResolverException.java:17)
...
at compiler.aot.AotCompiler.resolveLinker(AotCompiler.java:270)
at compiler.aot.AotCompiler.launchCompiler(AotCompiler.java:112)
at compiler.aot.AotCompiler.main(AotCompiler.java:78)
...

...and since it is a part of this block:

        } catch (ArtifactResolverException e) {
            System.err.println("artifact resolution error: " + e); // <--- calling to broken toString() here
            e.printStackTrace(System.err);
            // let jaotc try to find linker
            return null;
        }

...we never actually get to // let jaotc try to find linker part, and that is why I suspect it causes Windows x86_64 tier1/compiler failures in GitHub workflows. See below, Windows tier1/compiler tests are now passing. (There are some infra failures in other places on Windows, though).


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x32 Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (1/1 passed) ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) ❌ (1/9 failed) ✔️ (9/9 passed)

Failed test task

Issue

  • JDK-8255225: compiler/aot tests fail on Windows with NPE during artifact resolution

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/800/head:pull/800
$ git checkout pull/800

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2020

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2020

@shipilev To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • 2d
  • awt
  • beans
  • build
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah
  • sound
  • swing

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/label build

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 22, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2020

@shipilev
The build label was successfully added.

@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2020 11:12
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 22, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 22, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@erikj79 erikj79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks for fixing it!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 22, 2020

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255225: compiler/aot tests fail on Windows with NPE during artifact resolution

Reviewed-by: erikj, clanger

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8afdcae: 8255031: Update java/util/prefs/AddNodeChangeListener.java to report more failure info
  • 0aa3c92: 8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @SPEC tag
  • a0b687b: 8254854: [cgroups v1] Metric limits not properly detected on some join controller combinations
  • f279ddf: 8248411: [aarch64] Insufficient error handling when CodeBuffer is exhausted
  • 4634dbe: 8223312: Utilize handshakes instead of is_thread_fully_suspended
  • cc50c8d: 8255196: Remove unused G1FullGCCompactionPoint::merge()
  • ae72b52: 8255047: Add HotSpot UseDebuggerErgo flags
  • 211bb62: 8255124: KeepAliveStreamCleaner may crash with java.lang.IllegalMonitorStateException: current thread is not owner
  • 299e115: 8198395: Test javax/swing/plaf/metal/MetalLookAndFeel/Test8039750.java fails in mach5
  • a5b7bc5: 7156347: javax/swing/JList/6462008/bug6462008.java fails
  • ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8d9e6d01fb4cfdc1d5e1bcc0f30157158b974bd3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 22, 2020
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @erikj79! I want this fixed sooner, is it OK to push now? Or should we ask someone else to review too?

Copy link
Contributor

@RealCLanger RealCLanger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for fixing it. I saw it in our CI as well.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@shipilev Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a824781: 8255210: [Vector API] jdk/incubator/vector/Int256VectorTests.java crashes on AVX512 machines
  • 2ca7a08: 8255268: 32-bit failures in runtime/Metaspace/elastic
  • d8d9197: 8242559: Clean the "libawt_xawt" library from code for headless mode
  • ff5f226: 8255086: Update the root locale display names
  • 8afdcae: 8255031: Update java/util/prefs/AddNodeChangeListener.java to report more failure info
  • 0aa3c92: 8255262: Remove use of legacy custom @SPEC tag
  • a0b687b: 8254854: [cgroups v1] Metric limits not properly detected on some join controller combinations
  • f279ddf: 8248411: [aarch64] Insufficient error handling when CodeBuffer is exhausted
  • 4634dbe: 8223312: Utilize handshakes instead of is_thread_fully_suspended
  • cc50c8d: 8255196: Remove unused G1FullGCCompactionPoint::merge()
  • ... and 16 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/8d9e6d01fb4cfdc1d5e1bcc0f30157158b974bd3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 64dc4b1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8255225-aot-windows branch October 23, 2020 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants