Skip to content

8284521: Write an automated regression test for JComponent.setRequestFocusEnabled() #8143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

manukumarvs
Copy link
Member

@manukumarvs manukumarvs commented Apr 7, 2022

Write an automated regression test for JDK-4371575

Issue:
As part of the Merlin focus project, JComponent.setRequestFocusEnabled was
deprecated and its implementation was changed to map exactly to the new
method Component.setFocusable. Scott believes that the old behavior may be
preferable. He would like to be able to specify that a Component is focusable,
and should receive focus during keyboard traversal, but that it should not
automatically take focus when the user clicks on it with the mouse.

We are concerned that the accessibility team would be against this behavior,
and this also seems like more of a PLAF issue. Nevertheless, we should look
into it before beta ships.

Fix:
After some discussion we decided that the best balance of the old and new would be to make this an advisory property. This property will not be synonymous with focusable. Instead our mouse listeners will check this property before requesting focus. This provides as closely as possible the old behavior, while allowing people to use the new focusable property if they don't want a component focusable at all.

Testing:
Tested in mach5, 10 times with all the 3 available platform like macosx, windows and linux and got all Pass.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8284521: Write an automated regression test for RFE 4371575

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8143/head:pull/8143
$ git checkout pull/8143

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8143
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8143/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8143

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8143

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8143.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 7, 2022

👋 Welcome back mvs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@manukumarvs manukumarvs marked this pull request as draft April 7, 2022 11:11
@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review and removed rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 7, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 7, 2022

@manukumarvs The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 7, 2022
@manukumarvs manukumarvs marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2022 11:37
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 7, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 7, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before I look at the test, can you get rid of the pointless directory 4371575
A directory might be needed if you had a lot of files for the test - but you don't !
And I really don't like naming directories OR tests with the bugid. Someone can find
that out from the @bug tag.

I know you've pushed a bunch of bugs already that follow this pattern but update all the "in progress" ones to NOT create pointless extra folders.

@manukumarvs
Copy link
Member Author

Before I look at the test, can you get rid of the pointless directory 4371575 A directory might be needed if you had a lot of files for the test - but you don't ! And I really don't like naming directories OR tests with the bugid. Someone can find that out from the @bug tag.

I know you've pushed a bunch of bugs already that follow this pattern but update all the "in progress" ones to NOT create pointless extra folders.

I have removed those directories from this PR and from my other open PRs #7906 and #7996

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2022

@manukumarvs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8284521: Write an automated regression test for RFE 4371575

Reviewed-by: prr, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 606 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 37e28ae: 8282221: x86 intrinsics for divideUnsigned and remainderUnsigned methods in java.lang.Integer and java.lang.Long
  • 0b867b5: 8284330: jcmd may not be able to find processes in the container
  • eab4c0c: 8283706: Add final or sealed modifier to appropriate javax.swing API classes
  • 3357d9a: 8284588: Remove GensrcCommonLangtools.gmk
  • a8c8752: 8284556: Ensure reachability of classes in runtime/whitebox/TestHiddenClassIsAlive.java and serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderHierarchyTest.java
  • 662320a: 8284336: CDS SignedJar.java test fails due to archived Reference object
  • 1bd8975: 8284361: Updating ASM to 9.3 for JDK 19
  • 0a02675: 8279876: Clean up: isAssignableFrom usages in xpath and jdk internal classes
  • d6b4693: 8283698: Refactor Locale constructors used in src/test
  • 61698bd: 8284533: Improve InterpreterCodelet data footprint
  • ... and 596 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/f07b8165231799383303e5c0755d07afd2feb7fd...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@prrace, @mrserb) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 8, 2022
@manukumarvs
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Apr 10, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2022

@manukumarvs
Your change (at version 1f0e102) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@manukumarvs
Copy link
Member Author

@mrserb Can you sponsor this PR?

@akolarkunnu
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2022

Going to push as commit 447c2d1.
Since your change was applied there have been 690 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 19, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 19, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Apr 19, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 19, 2022

@akolarkunnu @manukumarvs Pushed as commit 447c2d1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@manukumarvs manukumarvs deleted the 8284521 branch May 4, 2022 07:49
@manukumarvs manukumarvs changed the title 8284521: Write an automated regression test for RFE 4371575 8284521: Write an automated regression test for JComponent.setRequestFocusEnabled() Oct 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants