Skip to content

8255340: [s390] build failure after JDK-8255208 #835

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Oct 23, 2020

vm_version_s390.cpp:839:52: error: no matching function for call to 'Disassembler::decode(CodeBuffer*, u_char*&, u_char*&, outputStream*&)'
This function was removed. I'm using the one without the CodeBuffer* argument (like on PPC64).


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x32 Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ⏳ (1/1 running) ⏳ (4/5 running) ⏳ (2/2 running) ⏳ (2/2 running)

Issue

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/835/head:pull/835
$ git checkout pull/835

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 23, 2020

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@TheRealMDoerr The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 23, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 23, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255340: [s390] build failure after JDK-8255208

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 23, 2020
@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!
/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 23, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 23, 2020
@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr deleted the 8255340_s390_build branch October 23, 2020 12:21
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 23, 2020

@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit 12daf2b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants